Advertisement

April 16, 2014

Macau Adopts New Rules Applicable to the Supply of Slot Machines and Related Equipment

Over 10 years after the gaming market liberalization in the Macau Special Administrative Region, the Macau Government has for the first time enacted, in the form of an Administrative Regulation, a set of rules concerning the approval of gaming manufacturers, electronic gaming machines and related equipment and gaming systems being supplied to the Macau market.

Administrative Regulation 26/2012 (approved on November 16, 2012) was published in the Official Gazette on November 26, 2012, and came into force on the following day, November 27, 2012.

The legal definition of gaming equipment under the scope of Administrative Regulation 26/2012 includes all devices, programs or software that operate totally or partially by electronic and/or mechanical means and are conceived, adapted or programmed to run or store games of chance in which the player may receive a payment in cash or in equivalent tokens or values as the result of a bet placed.

The supply of slot machines and related equipment to the gaming concessionaires and sub-concessionaires, as well as slot machine distributors, is from now on reserved to approved (licensed) manufacturers. The responsibility to approve the gaming manufacturers, conduct suitability checks and to approve the electronic gaming machines and related systems and equipment being supplied in Macau lies with the Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ), the gaming regulator in Macau.

There are four main principles that shape the legal framework of the new slot machine regulations: (i) the institution of an approval/licensing procedure for all gaming manufacturers doing business in Macau, (ii) a gaming manufacturer corporate suitability check, (iii) an approval process for all the slot machines and related equipment being supplied in Macau, and (iv) a set of ongoing regulatory compliance obligations imposed on the gaming manufacturers.

Any gaming manufacturer wishing to supply slot machines and related equipment to the gaming operators in Macau must be approved in advance by DICJ. This means that Administrative Regulation 26/2012 has indeed established, for the first time, a direct regulatory relationship between the gaming manufacturers and the Macau gaming regulator (DICJ). Prior to the adoption of the Regulation, everything concerning the supply, approval and installation of slot machines was processed with DICJ through the six gaming concessionaires and sub-concessionaires.

In order to be approved/licensed as a gaming manufacturer by DICJ, an initial request must be submitted together with required detailed information that includes, but is not limited to: (i) the list of jurisdictions where the gaming manufacturer is authorized to do business, (ii) the certification by the jurisdiction elected as the main jurisdiction that the license is valid in that jurisdiction and that there are no pending administrative procedures against the gaming manufacturer for violations in the previous 12 months, (iii) description, by jurisdiction, of all models of slot machines that the gaming manufacturer is authorized to supply, install, program and maintain, (iv) the organizational chart of the gaming manufacturer and of all its shareholders, with 5% or more of the share capital, up to the ultimate shareholder, and (v) the composition of the gaming manufacturer corporate bodies.

The licensing procedure of gaming manufacturers involves a suitability check on the applicant and its shareholders and directors. The suitability check may, however, be waived following a request to that effect if the gaming manufacturer is already licensed in one of the following jurisdictions: Nevada, New Jersey and Mississippi in the United States; Australia; New Zealand; Great Britain; or Singapore.

Crafted with a considerable influence from the Australian model, after a long legislative process initiated back in 2004/05, only time will tell if the legislative options materialized in this gaming regulatory enhancement will actually provide for a more credible and transparent gaming market regarding the supplying of electronic gaming machines. At the end of the day, the success of the new regulations will depend mostly on the way they will be enforced.

To read the full article on Macau’s new gaming equipment manufacturer regulations, click here.

© Copyright 2014 Dickinson Wright PLLC

About the Author

The gaming industry faces a myriad of complex issues. Therefore, casinos, casino developers and others involved in the gaming industry require a legal team with the knowledge and experience to provide a full-service solution.

Dickinson Wright boasts a team of lawyers with diverse specialties that cover the entire spectrum of today's commercial and Indian gaming industries, both nationally and internationally.

The gaming practice’s areas of expertise include:

Assisting commercial casino developers by obtaining gaming licenses; obtaining approval of state...

517-487-4715

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.