May 24, 2012

"Made in Taiwan" Now OK for Sales to U.S. Government

Many companies with a supply chain or manufacturing facilities in Taiwan have long been precluded from selling their products to the U.S. Government because of domestic preferences. Effective August 11, 2009, the main barrier has been removed.

While most business persons have heard of the Buy American Act restrictions in selling to the U.S. Government, it is instead the Trade Agreements Act which now applies to more sales - all contracts for supplies or services that exceed $194,000. For example, all sales of commercial products on the popular General Services Administration ("GSA") "schedules" are subject to the Trade Agreements Act. The Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") describes the situation concisely:

The Trade Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 2501, et seq.) provides the authority for the President to waive the Buy American Act and other discriminatory provisions for eligible products from countries that have signed an international trade agreement with the United States, or that meet certain other criteria, such as being a least developed country. The President has delegated this waiver authority to the U.S. Trade Representative ["USTR"]. In acquisitions covered by the [World Trade Organization] WTO [Government Procurement Agreement] GPA, Free Trade Agreements, or the Israeli Trade Act, the USTR has waived the Buy American Act and other discriminatory provisions for eligible products. Offers of eligible products receive equal consideration with domestic offers.

FAR 25.402(a)(1).

A country that has become a party to the WTO GPA and provides appropriate reciprocal competitive government procurement opportunities to U.S. products and services and supplies of such products and services is a "designated" country under the Trade Agreements Act.

Taiwan's Road To Designated Country Status
In 2002, Taiwan formally joined the WTO. Shortly thereafter, Taiwan submitted a proposal to accede to the GPA, allowing other foreign countries the opportunity to compete in Taiwan's public procurement market, while simultaneously permitting Taiwan to compete in those same countries' foreign procurement markets, including the much coveted U.S. market, which is valued at more than $200 billion. In May 2009, Taiwan's legislature approved Taiwan's GPA proposal and on June 8, 2009, Taiwan's President Ma Ying-jeou formally finalized the accession proposal, forwarding it to the WTO in Geneva for final approval. Taiwan's accession papers were received by the WTO on June 16, 2009, triggering a mandatory 30-day waiting period, after which time the accession was completed.

On July 14, 2009, the USTR issued a determination that Taiwan is designated a party to the WTO GPA for purposes of the Trade Agreements Act. 74 Fed. Reg. 34072 (July 14, 2009) at 34072.

What Does It All Mean?
When one of the Trade Agreements Act clauses is included in the solicitation for supplies or services by the US Government, the end product being purchased must either be a U.S. end product or a WTO GPA country end product (the Department of Defense version of the clause includes variations, but is similar). The test for a WTO GPA, or designated country, end product is: "WTO GPA country end product" means an article that—

(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a WTO GPA country; or (2) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in a WTO GPA country into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was transformed. The term refers to a product offered for purchase under a supply contract, but for purposes of calculating the value of the end product includes services, (except transportation services) incidental to the article, provided that the value of those incidental services does not exceed that of the article itself.

FAR 52.225-4 (emphasis added).

If the end products are not substantially transformed in the U.S. or a WTO GPA country, the offeror is required to disclose the country in which the end products were transformed in a proposal. To accept those end products, the U.S. Government procurement office must obtain a waiver, which involves other factors and tests and is not favored.

On August 11, 2009, the FAR was amended to include Taiwan as a designated country under the Trade Agreements Act. 74 Fed. Reg. 40458 (Aug. 11. 2009) at 40461 2.

The Good News
Many U.S. and global companies have manufacturing operations in Taiwan. To comply with the Trade Agreements Act before this rule change, these companies were moving some of their operations to the U.S. or designated countries for U.S. Government sales. This change should open the U.S. Government market to many companies and products that could not qualify before. There are nuances not covered in this short article, so please obtain advice before commencing sales of Made in Taiwan products to the U.S. Government.

Copyright © 2004-2009 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Holly Emrick Svetz handles a wide range of matters involving agreements with the government. Her extensive experience includes:

  • bid protests and claims litigation at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, General Services Board of Contract Appeals, Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals, Government Accountability Office, Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals, Virginia and District of Columbia state and federal courts
  • government grant and contract compliance counseling and training
  • solicitation and...
703-394-2261

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.