Advertisement

July 26, 2014

Mary Jo White, Nominee for Chair of the SEC, Appears Before Senate Banking Committee

On March 12, Mary Jo White, President Obama’s nominee to chair the Securities and Exchange Commission, appeared at her confirmation hearing before the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

In prepared testimony, Ms. White highlighted a few of her priorities for the SEC, if she is confirmed. First, Ms.White noted the need to complete, “in as timely and smart a way as possible, ”rulemaking required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. In that regard, Ms. White underscored the need for a transparent and robust” analysis of the economic impact of any such rulemaking, from the outset, to ensure effective and efficient rulemaking without unnecessary burdens or competitive harm. Second, she highlighted the need to strengthen the enforcement function of the SEC, with a view toward instilling confidence and a sense of fairness among investors and other market participants. Finally, she expressed the need for the SEC to keep pace with a hightech,highspeed and dispersed marketplace, noting a greater sense of urgency is required to address issues associated with modern day securities markets.

Although most committee members appeared supportive of Ms. White’s confirmation, committee members raised issues relating to potential conflicts of interest arising from her (and her husband’s) legal practices.Questions posed by committee members also evidenced concerns about a so called “revolving door” between the SEC and the businesses it regulates. Ms. White responded that she does not necessarily embrace the policy views of her private clients, and will “work as zealously as is possible” on behalf of the American public as her client.

To view the complete text of Mary Jo White’s prepared testimony, click here

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

Mark D. Wood, Energy Attorney, Katten Muchin Law firm
Partner

Mark D. Wood is head of Katten's Securities practice and concentrates in corporate and securities law. Mark represents public companies, issuers and investment banks in initial public offerings (IPOs) and other public offerings, private investment in public equity (PIPE) transactions, debt securities and other securities matters.

312-902-5493

About the Author

Jonathan D. Weiner, Mergers Acquisitions Attorney, Katten Muchin Law firm
Associate

Jonathan Weiner concentrates his practice in securities, transactional and general corporate matters. He has represented investors and issuers in public and private financings (including private investments in public equity), tender offers, recapitalizations and going private transactions, as well as targets and acquirers in mergers and acquisitions. He also advises clients on a day-to-day basis regarding corporate governance, securities law compliance, disclosure and other general corporate matters. Jonathan has counseled a wide array of businesses, ranging from start-ups to midsize and...

212-940-6349

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.