July 13, 2014

Media Reporting Impostors Posing As FDA Inspectors

As happens from time to time, recently various news media have reported that companies claim to have been visited by fraudulent FDA inspectors, i.e., people impersonating FDA inspectors to gain access to company facilities and records for illegitimate purposes. The impostors’ motives are not always known, although theft of trade secrets and other crimes are likely candidates.

Any company subject to regulation by FDA should have a written policy for handling an FDA inspection. Among other things, the policy should always include requiring the inspector to produce identification, including a badge, at the very beginning. In light of the reports of impostors, companies may want to consider additional safeguards. In particular, the person responsible for interacting with the inspector should consider contacting the relevant FDA District Office to confirm that it employs an inspector by the name given and that the inspector is supposed to be inspecting the company on that day. It is not adequate simply to confirm that the FDA has an inspector by a particular name, because an impostor can also learn the name of a real inspector to give and enhance his or her apparent bona fides.

Companies in the food and medical device industries should be particularly cautious if an alleged FDA inspector shows up unannounced for a surprise inspection. In those industries, the FDA typically schedules inspections in advance, so a surprise inspection is a red flag for potential fraud. Another red flag for fraud is if the inspector asks for commercially-sensitive information, such as sales or profit figures or prices, that even a legitimate FDA inspector is not entitled to see. It has been reported that impostors have stated that an inspection otherwise went well and will be closed if they are given access to such information.


About the Author

Lynn C. Tyler, M.S, Barnes Thornburg Law Firm, Patent Attorney

Lynn C. Tyler is a partner and registered patent lawyer in the firm’s Intellectual Property Department. Mr. Tyler helps innovative companies secure and preserve their market position and competitive advantage by navigating their way through the FDA to the marketplace and enforcing their intellectual property rights, which often must be protected against imitators who seek to reap where they have not sown. He litigates intellectual property matters and represents clients at virtually all stages of the process, including pre-litigation counseling, alternative dispute resolution, formal...


About the Author

Hae Park-Suk, Barnes Thornburg Law firm, Patent Attorney
Of Counsel

Hae Park-Suk is of counsel in the Washington, D.C., office and a member of the Intellectual Property Department. Ms. Park-Suk counsels clients on the selection, adoption, availability, and proper use of trademarks. Her practice consists of searching and clearing trademarks, prosecuting domestic and international trademark applications, managing extensive foreign trademark portfolios, assisting clients in planning and structuring their worldwide trademark strategies, assisting clients in protecting and enforcing their trademarks in the U.S. and worldwide, coordinating intellectual property...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.