Advertisement

May 24, 2013

Medical Loss Ratio Refunds

If you are an employer that sponsors a fully insured medical plan option for your employees, and you had that fully insured medical plan option in place for the 2011 calendar year, you may be eligible for a Medical Loss Ratio rebate.

Are you an employer that sponsors a fully insured medical plan option for your employees?  Did you have that fully insured medical plan option in place for the 2011 calendar year?  If so, you may be eligible for a Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rebate.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act), enacted on March 23, 2010, amended the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) by adding Section 2718.  This new section requires that health insurance issuers (Issuers) publicly report on major categories of spending of policyholder premium dollars, such as clinical services provided to enrollees and activities that will improve health care quality.  In addition, the law establishes MLR standards for Issuers.  The MLR is the percentage of dollars used by the Issuer to pay medical claims costs versus administrative fees, expenses and profits.  The MLR for a large group is 85 percent, while the MLR for a small group or individual policy is 80 percent.  Special MLR rules apply to “mini-med” and expatriate policies.  If an Issuer does not meet the MLR standard, it is required to provide rebates to policyholders.      

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued regulations interpreting and implementing the requirements of section 2718 of the PHSA, however the regulations do not give specific instructions to policyholders who are group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), or who are the sponsors of such plans, regarding their responsibilities under ERISA.  To the extent that the MLR rebate is a plan asset, it is subject to ERISA’s fiduciary restrictions on the treatment of plan assets.  Generally, ERISA requires that plan assets not inure to the benefit of any employer and be held for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to plan participants and beneficiaries and defraying reasonable expenses of plan administration.  The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released Technical Release No. 2011-04 to provide plan sponsors guidance in this area.  Whether or not your MLR rebate is a plan asset, and whether you as the plan sponsor may keep all or part of the MLR rebate, is very fact specific.  How the MLR rebate is refunded to your plan participants may result in taxable income to those participants.  You do, however, have options.

The Issuer is required, in certain circumstances, to send an MLR rebate notice to both the employer and employees.  Therefore, employers should be prepared to respond to questions from employees who receive the notice.  Thus, this MLR notice may have some employees expecting that they will receive checks from the Issuer, so employers may want to issue their own communication.

If all or a portion of the MLR rebate constitute plan assets, DOL guidance indicates that the rebate must be used within three months of receipt or must be placed into trust.  If you have not been contacted by your Issuer, you may wish to reach out to your Issuer to confirm that you are not eligible for a rebate.  (You should have received notice if your insurance policy was not eligible for an MLR rebate for 2011).  2011 MLR rebates were due by August 1, 2012.

© 2013 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Partner

Amy Gordon is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  She focuses her practice on the areas of welfare benefits, including self-funded and insured health plans. She assists clients in designing and maintaining compliant flexible benefit, life, medical, dental, pharmacy, EAP, educational assistance, disability, supplemental health, severance, Health Savings Accounts, Health Reimbursement Accounts, and other types of welfare plans.  She counsels clients with respect to HIPAA, ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code...

312-984-6931

About the Author

Partner

Susan M. Nash is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Susan focuses her practice primarily in the area of health and welfare benefit plans, including compliance with COBRA, HIPAA, ERISA, the Affordable Care Act, the Internal Revenue Code, and other federal laws affecting group health plans.

312-984-7660

Contributors

Partner

Jamie A. Weyeneth is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.

312-984-6913

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.