Advertisement

May 26, 2013

Medicare's Sustainable Growth Rate’s Costly Fix

Last week the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a revised scorefor fixing the Sustainable Growth Rate Formula (SGR), the formula by which Medicare reimburses physicians.  Unless Congress acts by January 1, 2013, physicians and (other health care professionals) who treat Medicare beneficiaries will be hit with a 27 percent cut in their reimbursement.  According to CBO’s latest report, it costs more than $18 billion to freeze physicians’ reimbursements at their current level for 2013.

SGR cuts are nothing new, though the amount of the cuts has varied over the years.  For over a decade Congress has enacted legislation to temporarily prevent the cuts from taking place.  In this Congress committees of jurisdiction – Senate Finance, House Energy and Commerce, and House Ways and Means – have held hearings or discussions on ways to fix the SGR, but so far there has been no consensus on how to move forward.  Cost of replacing the SGR has certainly hampered efforts to develop a fix.  CBO estimates that replacing the SGR formula can cost as much as $376.6 billion over 10 years.  With very few legislative days remaining in this Congress, and what promises to be a lively lame-duck session, at this point many predict that Congress will once again enact a temporary fix to the problem.

©2013 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

The Drinker Biddle Health Government Relations team is composed of lawyers and government relations professionals who have extensive experience advancing client interests before the legislative and executive branches of government at the federal, state and municipal levels. We use this experience to assist health care providers, academic medical centers, membership trade organizations, health professional societies, patient advocacy associations and other entities advance their public policy and advocacy agendas. 

(202) 230-5126

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.