Advertisement

June 20, 2013

Michigan Bill Prohibiting Grad Students from Unionizing Passes House

Organizing Michigan graduate student research assistants (known as GSRAs) were struck a blow recently after the state House passed a bill aimed at prohibiting the students from unionizing.  SB 971 amended Michigan’s Public Employment Relations Act (PERA) to specifically exclude GSRAs from the definition of “public employees” for the purposes of unionization. The bill passed the Michigan House by a 62-45 vote on March 1. The bill had previously been passed by the Senate in February. It must be signed by Michigan Governor Rick Snyder before it can take effect.

The bill was introduced as a direct reaction to the efforts of University of Michigan GSRAs to unionize. That effort was already hindered by litigation in front of the Michigan Employee Relations Commission (MERC), which issued a ruling last year finding that the GSRAs were not public employees.  MERC granted the GSRAs’ motion for reconsideration of that decision and the final decision is currently pending. But passage of SB 971 will likely make that case moot. 

The NLRB has dealt with a similar issue with private universities in the past, first finding that GSRAs could unionize in New York University, decided in 2000, and then reversing this decision four years later in Brown University. A petition is currently pending by NYU students seeking to overturn Brown but it is unclear when the Board will issue a decision.

See also:

Bill aimed at keeping Michigan grad students from unionizing passes House (Michigan Radio)

State House passes bill to keep grad students from unionizing (Detroit Free Press)

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Associate

Christine Holst is an associate in the Grand Rapids office of Barnes & Thornburg and is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Department. She focuses her practice on general labor and employment matters and defense of Title VII, ADEA, and other employment discrimination cases.

616-742-3927

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.