Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Michigan: PLA Deja Vu All Over Again?

Michigan Governor Rick Snyder has signed into law Michigan’s second attempt to regulate mandatory project labor agreements (PLA) on taxpayer-funded construction.

Michigan adopted a similar bill in 2011, but a federal district court invalidated it in February 2011 ruling that the Act attempted to regulate a field that was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act.  That decision is on appeal to the 6th Circuit.  A similar ruling on a similar statute in Idaho is also on appeal to the 9th Circuit.

The difference between the two Michigan Acts is that the new law expressly states that publicly funded project contracts may be awarded to companies that choose to sign a PLA.  Thus, public projects, under the new Act, cannot mandate that contractors must sign a PLA to participate in the project, but leaves the door open for voluntary participation in PLAs if the contractors so choose. 

Chris Fisher, President of Associated Builders and Contractors of Michigan, in response to the new Act, said that, “This law means that all businesses and all workers—union and non-union alike—have a level playing field to compete for and build publicly-funded construction projects and insure that nobody is denied a fair shot at succeeding in Michigan.” 

However, John Canzano, who represents the Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council, is quoted by the Bureau of National Affairs that, “It’s like Groundhog Day.  They keep passing the same law.”  Canzano, whose organization challenged the first law, asserts that they will also challenge the second Act.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Gerald F. (“Jerry”) Lutkus is a partner in the South Bend office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP where he is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law and Litigation Departments. He practices in the areas of labor and employment law counseling and litigation, arbitration, collective bargaining, media law, including counseling of and defense litigation for media companies and commercial and business litigation.

574-237-1118

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.