Advertisement

April 20, 2014

Michigan Unemployment Insurance Reform: A Little Something For Everyone

On December 19, Governor Snyder signed S.B. 806 into law.  The most significant aspect of the legislative package in which the bill was included calls for a State Bond Issue  to raise monies sufficient to repay Michigan's massive UI debt to the federal government.  S.B. 806, however, also contains one of the most broad-based arrays of changes to the Employment Security Act in years, even if those changes are more incremental than monumental. 

Many of the changes are designed to both toughen disqualification standards and facilitate the Agency's recovery of improperly paid benefits from claimants. Some of the remaining changes of particular significance to Michigan employers include:

Section 13 – Employers will now be able to correct errors on timely-filed Quarterly Reporting forms without penalty if they do so within 14 days of Agency notification.  Also, employers with 25 or more employees will be required to file all quarterly reports electronically beginning January 1, 2013.  There is a more gradual phase-in of this requirement for smaller employers, some of whom will also be given the opportunity to spread UI taxes out over all four calendar quarters of a given year, as opposed to getting "socked" in the first and second quarters.

Section 17 – Benefits paid to an claimant solely on the basis of combining Michigan and out-of-state employment during a base period will be charged to the Nonchargeable Benefits Account and not the Michigan employer.

Section 19 – The look-back period for calculating the largest portion of the employer's tax rate, the Chargeable Benefits Component, will change from the current 5 years to 4 years in 2012, and then to 3 years in 2013.

Section 27 – The earnings reduction in weekly benefits and corresponding cap on the combination of weekly earnings and UI benefit payments will change from $.50 per dollar of claimant earnings and a maximum combined equal to 150% of the claimant's weekly benefit rate, to $.40 per dollar of earnings and a maximum combined of 160% of the weekly benefit rate. This provision will sunset in 2015, and the Agency will be required in the interim to report on its impact.

Section 29(1)(a) – The definition of and disqualification for "voluntary leaving" has been expanded to include 3-day no-call, no-shows and an employee's loss of a fundamental job requirement (i.e., licensure or other required certification).  Also, in cases of medically-driven separations from employment, the leaving will be deemed involuntary only if a claimant: 1) obtains a medical professional's statement the job is harmful to the claimant; 2) shows no alternative work is available with the employer; and 3) shows no leave of absence is available.  Also, if an individual working two jobs quits the part-time job and later loses the full-time job, any benefits otherwise based on earnings in the part-time job would be charged to the nonchargeable benefits account, and not to the part-time employer's account.

Section 29(5) – The transfer of base period wages that occurs when an individual resigns employment to accept full-time employment with another employer will now apply to separations occasioned by Union hiring halls that reassign employees to other contractor employers.

Section 29(6) – After a claimant collects half of his or her total weeks of entitlement, the claimant must apply for and accept any job that pays at least 120% of his or her weekly UI benefit rate.

Section 42 – The Agency will convert to the IRS 20-factor test for determining whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor under the Act, thereby eliminating possible ambiguity and confusion arising from its traditional use of the narrower "economic reality" test.

Section 44 – The annual taxable wage base for Michigan employers will increase from the current "first $9,000 of every employee's earnings" to the first $9,500 of those earnings, although there is a provision allowing this standard's return to $9,000 in the event the UI Trust Fund regains a sufficient positive balance in the future.

Employers who are actively involved in the administrative adjudication process should also remain alert to procedural changes that will occur, either as a result of this legislation or the new Administrative Rules on appeals the legislation requires the Michigan Administrative Hearings System to promulgate in the future.             

NOTE TO PEO EMPLOYERS:  Slipped into S.B. 806 were a couple of provisions on client level reporting that may merit your immediate attention. 

© 2014 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Richard A. Hooker, Varnum Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Partner

Dick Hooker has had significant experience in traditional labor relations, state/federal agency work, employment litigation, union election campaigns, unemployment insurance taxation matters, and arbitration of employment disputes. He is a facilitative mediator for the U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan and the Michigan Courts, and he is listed as an...

248-567-7429

About the Author

Luis E. Avila, Labor Employment Attorney, Varnum Law Firm
Associate

Luis focuses his practice on labor, employment and immigration issues. Luis has a wide range of experience in traditional labor matters, including grievances, arbitrations, collective bargaining negotiations, union drives, and matters in front of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Michigan Employment Relations Commission (MERC). Luis has counseled employers on a number of workplace matters, including effective employee handbooks and policies, disciplinary and dispute resolution procedures, discrimination, disability accommodation, wage-hour matters, family medical leave, and...

616-336-6742
Nancy L. Farnam, Varnum Law Firm, Employee Benefits Attorney
Partner

Nancy represents a wide range of employers in the design, documentation, administration and taxation of welfare benefit plans, qualified retirement plans and non-qualified deferred compensation plans.

248-567-7426

About the Author

Richard D. Fries, Varnum Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Partner

Rick is a partner in the Kalamazoo office. Since 1981, he has represented employers exclusively in solving labor and employment law problems in the workplace. He devotes most of his time to advising employers about how to avoid workplace crises, comply with state and federal labor and employment laws and regulations, and prevent litigation. He has significant experience counseling employers on how...

269-553-3516

About the Author

Associate

Jeff Gray is an associate in the Labor and Employment Relations practice group where he provides labor and employment advice and litigation services to public and private sector clients. Before entering private practice, Jeff served as Law Clerk to the Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan. 

616-336-6608

About the Author

David E. Khorey, Labor Employment Attorney, Varnum law firm
Partner

Dave’s “client-centered” practice involves a variety of labor and employment issues. He provides practical and confidential ongoing advice and consulting on a number of sensitive and complex labor and employment matters, from problem employee situations to multi-facility collective bargaining negotiations. His representative clients include diverse industries (such as automotive, printing,...

616-336-6608

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.