Advertisement

April 23, 2014

Mintz Levin Files FOIA Request for DOL Prevailing Wage Data

On December 7, 2012, Mintz Levin filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) with the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”). The request seeks disclosure of all documentation relating to prevailing wages, statistical methodologies and internal agency communications in connection with the agency’s administration of the Foreign Labor Certification Program. This request is also relevant for employers sponsoring individuals for H-1B visas; prevailing wage data for H-1B visas and green card labor certifications is sourced from the same surveys at DOL.

The scope of Mintz Levin’s FOIA request is broad, extending to documents that reference or describe DOL’s policy to withhold from the public information related to the manner in which data is collected, analyzed and subsequently disseminated for the purpose of calculating prevailing wages. Mintz Levin filed a separate FOIA Request for wage data compiled for each of the 50 states. DOL has confirmed receipt of these requests and is currently preparing a response.

The goal of this effort is to secure clarity and transparency in the prevailing wage process. This is important for employers who invest time and resources in retaining the best and brightest foreign talent through H-1B visa and green card sponsorship. Employers across the U.S. struggle to understand how the U.S. government calculates prevailing wage data for various occupations. Only four wage levels exist for prevailing wage determinations. And employers frequently find DOL wage data to be out of step with normal market conditions. The circumstances warrant a request to the DOL for the release of as much documentation as possible about the prevailing wage process.

Securing a prevailing wage is a first step for employers in a complex and burdensome H-1B visa or employment-based green card process. Employers should be able to commence an H-1B or green card process with the security of knowing that statistical data from the DOL is sound, compiled according to normative methodologies, and in line with the agency’s own regulations and standards for accepting prevailing wage survey data compiled by private sector organizations.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Douglas Hauer, Immigration Attorney, Mintz Levin Law Firm
Member

Douglas is a Member in the firm's Immigration Practice and also practices in the Israel Business Group. His practice focuses on business immigration law, related government investigations, family-based green card sponsorship processes, EB-5 investor visa filings, and corporate immigration policy development.

He has represented multinational corporations in the financial services, technology, management consulting, hedge fund, specialty chemicals, insurance, defense, and engineering sectors. He has in-depth experience counseling corporate clients on the immigration...

617-348-3044

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.