Advertisement

May 22, 2013

More Comments? ICANN Extends Public Comment Period For An Additional 45 Days

ICANN has announced that it has extended the public comment period for new generic top-level domain (gTLD) applications for an additional 45 days. The public comment period was scheduled to close on August 12th.  The new end date is now September 26, 2012.  ICANN stated that this extension will not impact other looming deadlines in the gTLD application review process. ICANN’s announcement regarding the extension comes after the Association for National Advertisers and others requested that ICANN extend the public comment period.

As discussed previously on this blog, a public comment does not amount to a formal objection.  Anyone can submit a comment and there is no fee for doing so.  Such comments are designed to bring relevant information and issues to the attention of those charged with processing new gTLD applications.  To submit a comment, users must create an account on the new gTLD Public Comment Forum.  Those seeking to post a comment must associate the comment with a specific application and the relevant review panel.  Application comments received by September 26th will be available to the evaluation panels performing the Initial Evaluation reviews.

According to the Applicant Guidebook, evaluators will perform due diligence on the application comments (i.e., determine their relevance to the evaluation, verify the accuracy of claims, analyze meaningfulness of references cited) and take the information provided in these comments into consideration. In cases where consideration of the comments has impacted the scoring of the application, the evaluators will seek clarification from the applicant. Statements concerning consideration of application comments that have impacted the evaluation decision will be reflected in the evaluators’ summary reports, which will be published at the end of the extended evaluation period. Where a comment relates to the subject matter of a formal objection, such comments will not be considered by panels during Initial Evaluation of gTLD applications. These comments will be available to and may be subsequently considered by an expert panel during a dispute resolution proceeding.

ICANN has appointed an Independent Objector (IO) to file formal objections (not comments) “solely in the best interests of the public who use the global Internet.”  The IO may file objections against “highly questionable” gTLD applications that may qualify as a Community or Public Interest Objection.  But in order for the IO to file a formal objection, there must be some public comment in opposition to an application.

Essentially, the comment period is the time for members of the public to bring relevant information and issues to the attention of those charged with handling new gTLD applications.  So you now have an extra 45 days to submit a comment on one or more of the 1930 pending gTLD applications.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.