Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Morningside House of Ellicott City to Pay $25,000 for Religious Discrimination

EEOC  Says Muslim Applicant Denied Hire Because of Hijab

An Ellicott City, Md., assisted living center will pay $25,000 and furnish  other relief to settle a religious discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S  Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.  The EEOC had charged that Morningside House of  Ellicott City denied hire to a Muslim job applicant because she refused to  remove her hijab, a headscarf worn by  Muslim women as a religious obligation.

In its  suit, (1:11-cv-02766-JKB), filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of  Maryland, Northern Division, the EEOC said that the director of health and  wellness asked Khadijah Salim if she would be willing to remove her hijab.  The directorexpressed  concerns that if she were hired, the hijab may interfere with her ability to work as a certified nursing assistant  (CNA).  Salim responded that she had worn  her hijab throughout her nursing  training, which included working in the operating room, and it had never  interfered with her ability to perform her duties.  Although she was told she would be contacted  if someone were interested in her, she was never contacted, nor was she one of  ten CNAs who were hired by the employer in September 2010.

Under Title  VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers have an obligation to  accommodate an employee’s or applicant’s sincerely held religious beliefs  unless it creates an undue hardship.  The  EEOC filed suit after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement  through its conciliation process.

In addition  to the monetary relief to Salim, the consent decree settling the suit enjoins  the senior living home from further discriminating against any individual on the  basis of religion; requires religious discrimination training to supervisors,  managers and all involved in the hiring process; to post a notice stating the  company’s commitment to maintaining an environment free of religious  discrimination; and submit copies of any complaints about religious  discrimination to the EEOC for a period of two years.

“In this case, there was no undue  hardship to the employer -- just an apparent overreaction to a reasonable  request because of myths and stereotypes about a religion,” said EEOC Regional  Attorney Debra M. Lawrence. 

According to its website, www.morningsidehouse.com,  “Morningside House has been proudly serving seniors and their families  since 1992 and is considered the ‘top-referred’ assisted living and dementia  care provider in the Baltimore / Washington area.”

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.