May 24, 2012

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Proposes Rule to Require Posting of National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) Rights

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently announced a proposed rule that would require employers to notify employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). According to the NLRB, the purpose of the notice is “to increase knowledge of the NLRA among employees, to better enable the exercise of rights under the statute, and to promote statutory compliance by employers and unions.”

The required notices would resemble the postings of workplace rights that are currently required under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act, and other workplace laws.

The NLRA applies to most private-sector workplaces. All employers whose workplaces fall under the NLRA would be required to post the employee rights notice where other workplace notices are typically posted. If an employer primarily communicates with its employees electronically, the notice would have to also be posted electronically. The required notice would be available at the agency’s regional offices and would be available for download from the NLRB website.

The NLRB intends to enforce the proposed rule by treating employer’s failure to post the notice as an unfair labor practice under the NLRA. Under the proposed rule, the consequences of noncompliance with the posting requirement include the extension of the 6-month statute of limitations for filing a charge involving other unfair labor practice allegations against the employer and, for willful violations, using the employer’s failure to post as evidence of unlawful motive in cases involving other alleged violations of the NLRA

One member of the NLRB has dissented against the issuance of the proposed rule, asserting that the NLRB lacks statutory authority to enforce posting requirement imposed on workplaces. Public comment has been invited on all aspects of the proposed rule and should be submitted within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register. Comments should be submitted either electronically to www.regulations.gov or by mail or hand-delivery to Lester A. Heltzer, Executive Secretary, NLRB, 1099 14th Street NW, Washington DC 20570.

A fact sheet and further information regarding the proposed rule may be found at www.nlrb.gov/About_Us/news_room/Notice_for_Rulemaking/.  

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Danielle’s practice is focused in the areas of Litigation and Employment Law. She represents employers in a wide range of employment and labor issues. She also assists with commercial and general litigation matters.

Prior Legal Experience

Danielle was a summer clerk at Poyner Spruill for two years before joining the firm. She also worked as a summer intern to the Honorable Donald L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Most recently, she worked at Emory Law School's Juvenile Defender Clinic, providing legal...

919-783-2982

About the Author

Partner

David practices in the area of employment litigation.  He regularly advises and defends clients in race, age, disability and sex discrimination and harassment cases; reviews handbooks and termination issues; and provides compliance advice on matters of employment law.

Representative Experience

McNeil v. Scotland County - Obtained summary judgment for employer where plaintiff alleged race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Successfully...

919-783-2854

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.