Advertisement

May 19, 2013

National Labor Relations Board - NLRB Updates Workload of Division Judges in 2012

Barnes & Thornburg LLP - a national law firm of more than 550 professionals
Peter T. Tschanz
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Monday, November 12, 2012
Administrative & Regulatory / Labor & Employment / Litigation / Trial Practice
All Federal
Printer-friendly
Email this Article
Download PDF
Reprints & Permissions

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently provided an update on the workload of its Division of Judges in 2012.  During 2012, Administrative Law Judges disposed of 645 cases. Of those 645 cases, the Judges issued 207 decisions and settled 438 cases.  According to the NLRB, "[t]he high ratio of settlements to decisions reflects a continuing effort by the Division to encourage the resolution of cases by the parties themselves, through judges’ involvement in pre-trial conference calls and on-site meetings."

The total case intake (many of which were resolved or withdrawn prior to assignment) increased slightly from the previous year -- 1,161 to 1,192.  If anything, these stats indicate that 2013 will be a busy year for the NLRB.

The full report can be found here.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Peter T. Tschanz
Associate

Peter T. Tschanz is an associate in the Indianapolis office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, where he is a member of the Labor & Employment Law Department. Mr. Tschanz concentrates his practice in representing management interests in both employment litigation and traditional labor matters.

Peter.Tschanz@btlaw.com
317-231-6452
www.btlaw.com

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.