Advertisement

May 20, 2013

N.C. Senate Okays Attorneys’ Fees for Administrative Cases Challenging State Agency Actions

Regulatory Law Watch

North Carolina may be headed toward allowing parties to recover their attorneys’ fees in administrative cases involving state agencies.  On May 31, the NC Senate passed the Regulatory Reform Act of 2012 (SB 810), which would “fine tune” significant changes wrought by the General Assembly last session as part of its effort to modify our state’s regulatory framework.  Arguably one of the most significant changes included in SB 810 is the new power granted to Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) to assess attorneys’ and witnesses’ fees against state agencies involved in contested cases.

In its current form, SB 810 would allow persons who prevail in certain contested cases challenging state agency actions to obtain an order from the presiding ALJ requiring the agency to reimburse the petitioners for their reasonable attorneys’ and/or witnesses’ fees.  The new potential for an assessment of such fees would be limited to situations where the ALJ finds that the state agency substantially prejudiced the petitioner’s rights and acted arbitrarily or capriciously.  If enacted into law, this new facet to contested cases could make state agencies think twice before taking questionable enforcement actions. 

SB 810 now moves to the NC House for consideration.  We will be following the Regulatory Reform Act of 2012 as it moves through the legislative process, and will provide updates on further developments of note.

© 2013 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Tom has been actively involved in Administrative Law issues since 1986 when he was among the first five people appointed to serve as a North Carolina Administrative Law Judge. While serving as an ALJ, he heard a number of cases involving health care and environmental penalties and licensure.

Since joining Poyner Spruill, Tom has focused on health care penalty and licensure cases, occupational licensure cases (Medicine, Nursing, Psychology, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Funeral, Alarm Systems), rulemaking proceedings before the North Carolina Rules Review Commission, and...

919-783-2897

About the Author

Partner

Pam represents businesses and professionals in administrative and civil litigation and appeals pertaining to a wide variety of regulatory compliance issues and professional licensure, as well as rulemaking proceedings before the North Carolina Rules Review Commission. Pam’s health care practice focuses on certificate of need (CON) litigation and appeals; regulatory compliance and professional licensure matters; and matters involving compliance with HIPAA privacy and security rules, the HITECH Act, and other privacy laws. She has assisted both covered entities and business associates...

919-783-2954

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.