Advertisement

April 16, 2014

NC Supreme Court Upholds Law Banning Video Sweepstakes

On December 14, 2012, the North Carolina Supreme Court issued an opinion upholding a North Carolina law outlawing video sweepstakes games, thus reversing prior rulings from the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Superior Court that had held the law violated the First Amendment. 

The statute at issue, Chapter 103 of the 2010 Session Laws codified at N.C.G.S. 14-306.4, makes it unlawful to "operate, or place into operation, an electronic machine or device" to "conduct a sweepstakes through the use of an entertaining display."  An "entertaining display" was defined as "visual information, capable of being seen by a sweepstakes entrant, that takes the form of actual game play, or simulated game play."  One example of an "entertaining display" is a game that simulates "video poker" or "video bingo" as well as "any other video game not dependent on skill or dexterity that is played while revealing a prize as the result of an entry into a sweepstakes."

The NC Court of Appeals had previously ruled that the law was overbroad and violated the First Amendment because video games are protected speech and the definition of "entertaining display" was virtually unlimited.  See Hest Techns, Inc. v. State ex rel. Perdue, 725 S.E. 2d 10, 12-14 (2012).

The NC Supreme Court, however, reversed the Court of Appeals and upheld the law.  The NC Supreme Court concluded that the statute "primarily regulates noncommunicative conduct rather than protected speech" and imposes "only incidental burdens on associated speech."

The News & Observer reports that Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger applauded the Supreme Court's ruling, stating:  "Now that the question is settled, I expect our law enforcement officials will begin enforcing the law."

Since the Court's decision involves issues of federal constitutional law, however, the ruling could be appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Copyright © 2014 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Jason Hicks, Antitrust Attorney, Womble Carlyle Law Firm
Attorney

Jason Hicks is a member of the Firm's Antitrust, Distribution and Franchise Law Practice Group. Jason has experience litigating cases and counseling clients in a wide variety of matters involving federal and state antitrust laws, franchise and dealer protection statutes, unfair and deceptive trade practices, advertising laws and regulations, industry-specific trade regulations, contract disputes, business torts, and constitutional law. Jason's practice focuses on helping clients efficiently and effectively move their products through various levels of distribution by developing...

202-857-4536

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.