Advertisement

May 20, 2013

New California Corporate Tax Market-Based Sourcing Regulation

Finalized regulation provides guidance on sales factor sourcing affecting filing requirements and apportionment exposure.

California recently finalized new California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 25136-2 (the Regulation). The Regulation is the latest in a series of significant changes that impact whether certain out-of-state entities must file tax returns in California, as well as how California taxpayers apportion income for purposes of the Corporation Franchise Tax (Franchise Tax). The Regulation is generally effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2011.

The Regulation provides guidance related to how taxpayers making a single sales factor election for purposes of the Franchise Tax must use market-based sourcing rules for sales of items other than tangible personal property, including services and intangibles. It provides a general rule before proceeding into a series of complex, cascading market-based sourcing rules and numerous examples.

It is important to note that the market-based sourcing rules will be used in applying California's new economic nexus standard under section 23101(b) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Under the new standard, a taxpayer is "doing business" within California if California sales for the applicable tax year exceed the lesser of (a) $500,000 or (b) 25% of the taxpayer's total sales.

Taxpayers with national distribution should consider this Regulation in the context of sweeping changes in California's Franchise Tax rules, including the adoption of the single sales factor election, the new statutory economic nexus standard, and a reversion to the Finnigan rule of apportionment. Out-of-state taxpayers should carefully consider these changes to avoid unexpected California tax exposures and to determine whether benefits may be obtained from these new provisions.

Copyright © 2013 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

William F. Colgin, Jr. is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice. His practice focuses on tax controversy and tax litigation, including representation of clients before the U.S. Tax Court, the Internal Revenue Service, and state taxing authorities. Mr. Colgin primarily represents corporate taxpayers and individual taxpayers in large dollar matters or complicated disputes.

415.442.1347

About the Author

Associate

William B. Clayton is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice. Mr. Clayton focuses his practice on tax controversy and tax litigation, including representation of clients before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. Tax Court, state courts, the Internal Revenue Service, state taxing authorities, and multistate tax dispute resolution organizations. Mr. Clayton primarily represents corporate taxpayers and individual taxpayers in large dollar matters or complicated disputes.

650-843-7546

Contributors

Associate

William H. Gorrod is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice. Mr. Gorrod focuses his practice on state and local tax issues, including controversy, planning, and compliance matters. His areas of focus include state and local income and franchise taxes, bank taxes, gross receipts taxes, unincorporated business taxes, sales and use taxes, and telecommunications taxes, as well as federal universal service fund contribution requirements.

650-843-7221

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.