Advertisement

May 25, 2013

New European Commission de minimis Regulation for SGEI

On 25 April 2012, the European Commission adopted a new de minimis regulation on compensation granted to companies that provide services of general economic interest (SGEI). Under the new regulation, compensation granted by public authorities for the provision of SGEI will fall outside the scope of EU State aid law if it does not exceed €500,000 per company over three years, more than double the previous threshold of €200,000. This will reduce significantly the administrative burden for providers of SGEI and public authorities in EU Member States. 

EU State aid law prohibits all forms of public funding to specific companies or industries, which confers a benefit on those companies or industries. There are no general exceptions but funding may be approved under certain circumstances by the European Commission after notification by the Member State.

The new de minimis regulation is the last piece of a new SGEI package that replaced the old 2005 package on 20 December 2011 when three of its four instruments came into effect (see our previous coverage here). The introduction of a specific de minimis rule was postponed after Member States criticised conditions in a previous draft relating to the turnover of the provider and the size of the local authority. These conditions have now been removed.

The SGEI package provides a general explanation of the basic concepts of State aid in relation to SGEI. It details the conditions under which compensation for SGEI is deemed to be compatible with EU State aid rules and thus exempt from the notification requirement. It also sets out the conditions under which public funding for SGEI service providers does not constitute State aid and therefore requires no notification. In addition, it provides guidelines for the assessment of SGEI compensation that is not exempted from the notification requirement and must be assessed individually.

It is essential for private companies that receive public funding for SGEI to know the rules and ensure they can keep the compensation they receive without the risk of infringing State aid rules. Because public authorities can structure their funding measures accordingly, the de minimis exemption is a valuable tool when the amount of public funding is limited. Public services and compensation for these services should be structured in a way that makes the most of the new SGEI package. 

© 2013 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Associate

Robert Bäuerle is an associate in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office.  His practice focuses on German and European competition law including merger control and state aid law.  

Before joining McDermott Will & Emery, Robert gained experience in  the competition group of an international law firm in Berlin and Brussels, as well as in the state aid control unit of the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. 

32 2 282 35 23

About the Author

Partner

Martina Maier is a partner in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office. Martina is head of the firm’s European Antitrust and Competition Practice Group and her practice focuses on German and European competition law, including State aid, single firm conduct, merger control and agreements restricting competition.   She has extensive experience in representing clients in a broad range of industries before the European Commission and national competition authorities and courts.

32 2 282 35 66

Contributors

Partner

Philipp Werner is a partner in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office.   His practice focuses on European and German competition law including State aid, merger control, cartels and abuse of dominance, and his clients include companies in the automotive, infrastructure, transport and health care sectors.

32 2 282 35 67

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.