April 19, 2014

New IRS Guidance for Charitable Hospitals

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act added section 501(r) to the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes new requirements on 501(c)(3) organizations (nonprofit hospitals) that operate one or more hospital facilities. Under section 501(r), each hospital facility operated by a 501(c)(3) organization must meet four general requirements on a facility-by-facility basis in order for the nonprofit hospital to maintain its tax exempt status:

  1. Establish written financial assistance and emergency care policies;
  2. Limit amounts charged for emergency or other medically necessary care to individuals eligible for assistance under the hospital’s financial assistance policy;
  3. Make reasonable efforts to determine whether an individual is eligible for financial assistance before engaging in extraordinary collection actions; and
  4. Conduct a community health needs assessment (“CHNA”) and adopt an implementation strategy at least once every three years.

Section 501 (r) became effective for tax years beginning after March 23, 2010, except for the CHNA requirement which became effective for tax years beginning after March 23, 2012.

The CHNA is a written report and implementation plan that identifies and ranks the community’s needs in the area where the hospital is located. If a tax-exempt hospital fails to conduct a CHNA, a $50,000 excise tax could be imposed. On August 14, 2013, the IRS issued final regulations outlining the excise tax filing process for tax-exempt hospitals that do not meet the CHNA requirement.

According to the newly-released guidance by the IRS, a tax-exempt hospital that is liable for excise tax must file a return on Form 4720 with its excise tax payment. Form 4720 must be filed by the 15th day of the fifth month after the end of the organization’s taxable year in which the liability was incurred. For tax-exempt facilities that inadvertently failed to comply with the CHNA requirement, there is relief as long as the hospital takes corrective measures. Tax-exempt status will only be revoked when a hospital’s failure to meet a requirement is willful or egregious.

The new requirements ushered in by the ACA are time-consuming and complicated. According to the American Hospital Association, satisfying the proposed requirements could take “thousands of hours and cost tens of thousands of dollars or more.”

© 2014 by McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Christopher J. Shaughnessy, Health Care Attorney, McBrayer Law Firm

Christopher J. Shaughnessy is an attorney at McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. Mr. Shaughnessy concentrates his practice area in health care and is located in the firm's Lexington office. He has extensive experience in the health care law industry. Mr. Shaughnessy represents institutions such as hospitals and nursing homes as well as individual medical professionals, including physicians, mid-level practitioners and nurses. He also represents small offices and large offices that are part of large networks. Some of the services he commonly provides are in the following...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Att