July 25, 2014

New IRS Guidance Takes Restrictive View of Material Participation by Non-Grantor Trusts

Recently published Technical Advice Memorandum 201317010 (the TAM) limits the circumstances in which a complex, non-grantor trust can materially participate in the activities of an S corporation. In the TAM, the IRS National Office concluded that a fiduciary’s participation in the activities of a trust count only toward material participation to the extent the fiduciary participated in those activities in a fiduciary capacity. Although the TAM evaluated material participation for purposes of the alternative minimum tax rules, its reasoning would also apply to the passive activity loss and credit rules and the new 3.8 percent net investment income tax.

The TAM considered whether trust shareholders materially participated in the business activities of an S corporation and its subsidiaries. The trusts were complex trusts that had a Trustee and a Special Trustee. The Special Trustee was a beneficiary of the trusts, was a shareholder of the S corporation, and was the president of one of the S corporation’s subsidiaries. The Special Trustee was permitted under the trust agreement to make all decisions regarding the sale or retention of the stock and all voting of the stock. The trusts argued that all of the Special Trustee’s time spent in the activities of the S corporation (as fiduciary, shareholder, and employee) should be considered. The IRS National Office concluded that only time spent by Special Trustee in his fiduciary capacity (for example, voting the trusts’ S corporation stock) counted toward the trusts’ material participation in the S corporation’s activities.

The TAM’s conclusion is at odds with the only judicial authority on this issue in Mattie K. Carter Trust v. U.S., 256 F.Supp.2d 536 (N.D. Tex. 2003). Although technical advice memorandums like the TAM are not precedential, given the lack of authoritative guidance on how trusts materially participate, any new pronouncement is significant because it shows that this issue is far from resolved. The TAM also highlights the increasing importance of the issue of material participation by trusts due to the 3.8 percent net investment income tax.


About the Author

Michala Irons, Tax Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law Firm

Michala P. Irons is an associate in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis, Indiana office and a member of the firm’s Tax Department. Ms. Irons assists individuals, businesses, and nonprofit organizations with federal tax planning, including income tax, employment and self-employment tax, excise tax, and net investment income tax issues.  Ms. Irons also represents taxpayers in matters before the Internal Revenue Service, including collections, examinations, appeals, and requests for private guidance from the IRS National Office.


About the Author

Randal Kaltenmark, Tax Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law firm

Randal J. Kaltenmark is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP's Indianapolis, Indiana office. He concentrates his practice in federal, state, and local tax controversies and audits, as well as tax planning for both public and private clients, including joint mergers, mergers, and acquisitions. Mr. Kaltenmark represents clients in audit and administrative proceedings before the Internal Revenue Service and state/local tax authorities. He also represents clients in appeals to both federal and state courts, including the United States and Indiana Tax Courts. Mr. Kaltenmark is...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.