April 19, 2014

New Jersey Adds New Employee-Protection Laws

New bills signed by Governor Chris Christie include important measures for employers relating to social media and pay equity, but many questions remain.

On August 29, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed into law two bills that impact employers in New Jersey by (1) limiting access to employees' social media accounts and (2) protecting employees who seek information regarding potential pay inequality.

New Social Media Protections

Assembly Bill A2878/S1915

The enactment of Assembly Bill A2878/S1915,[1] makes New Jersey the latest state to limit employers' ability to obtain access to the social media accounts of their current or prospective employees. The law prohibits employers from requesting that an applicant or employee provide access to any personal account on a social media website, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter. Employers are also prohibited from retaliating or discriminating against any individual who refuses to provide such access or who reports an alleged violation of the law.

The final version of the legislation, which will become effective on December 1, 2013, is significantly more employer friendly than the bill approved by the New Jersey Legislature in March. Responding to criticism by business groups, Governor Christie conditionally vetoed the original proposal, suggesting that the bill was well intentioned but "paint[ed] with too broad a brush." In response to the governor's veto, the bill's proponents significantly revised the proposal to include the following key protections for employers:

  • The law applies only to exclusively personal social media accounts and not those related to the business of the employer or utilized for business-related communications. Social media accounts created for or maintained on behalf of an employer or utilized for business purposes are not protected by the statute.

  • The law does not prohibit employers from asking applicants or employees if they have a social media account or from reviewing any public social media content.

  • The legislation does not create a private right of action to enforce its provisions. Instead, the New Jersey Department of Labor may pursue penalties of up to $1,000 for the first violation and $2,500 for each subsequent violation.

  • The law permits employers to obtain access to personal social media accounts to ensure legal/regulatory compliance, to investigate work-related employee misconduct, or to investigate potential disclosures of the employer's proprietary, confidential, or financial information.

Despite these important protections for employers, several questions remain unanswered, including the following:

  • How does an employer's monitoring of its computer systems impact employee privacy rights if employees log in to personal social media accounts from work computers?

  • How much "business-related" use is sufficient to exempt an otherwise "personal" social media account from the law's ban on employer access? Does merely "connecting with," "friending," or communicating with a business contact constitute a "business purpose" under the law?

  • Does a supervisor's request to "follow," "friend," or "connect with" an employee constitute a "request" for "access to" an employee's "personal account"?

Implications of Assembly Bill A2878/S1915

All New Jersey employers should take this opportunity to evaluate and consider revising their policies and internal procedures to ensure compliance with the legislation, including taking the following actions:

  • Ensure that current or prospective employees are not asked to provide log-in or password information for any personal social media account

  • Remind managers that retaliation based on the refusal by an applicant or employee to provide access to a personal social media account is prohibited

  • Evaluate the extent to which personal social media access is permitted in the workplace

Protection for Employees Investigating Pay Equity

Assembly Bill A2648/S1935

Assembly Bill A2648/S1935[2] amends New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination to prohibit retaliation against employees who seek information from current or former colleagues regarding their pay, benefits, and membership in protected groups "if the purpose of the request for the information was to assist in investigating the possibility of . . . potential discriminatory treatment concerning pay, compensation, bonuses, other compensation, or benefits." In 2012, Governor Christie conditionally vetoed the initial draft of the bill, which would have amended New Jersey's whistleblower law, the Conscientious Employee Protection Act. The revised bill defines the parameters of an employee's "protected conduct" more narrowly than the initial bill.

The amended Law Against Discrimination now prohibits reprisals against an employee who requests information from any current or former employee regarding their position and compensation (e.g., job title, occupational category, wages, and benefits) or the employee's membership in a protected class (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity, military status, or national origin), as long as the purpose of the request is to investigate or take legal action regarding alleged discrimination in compensation. Importantly, the provision does not require employees to respond to such inquiries from co-workers.

The new provision is effective immediately.

Implications of Assembly Bill A2648/S1935

All New Jersey employers should consider revising their employment policies and training supervisory personnel to ensure that employees who engage in protected conduct are treated in accordance with the amended Law Against Discrimination.

Copyright © 2014 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Prashanth Jayachandran, Labor, Employment, Attorney, Morgan Lewis, law firm
Of Counsel

Prashanth "PJ" Jayachandran is of counsel in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice. Mr. Jayachandran represents employers in a broad array of labor and employment law matters across the country. He represents clients in numerous industries, with a particular focus on companies in the financial services and pharmaceutical industry sectors.

Mr. Jayachandran handles a spectrum of federal and state employment litigation matters, including wage and hour collective actions. He has successfully achieved motions to dismiss and/or motions for...


About the Author


Rene M. Johnson is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice.


Thomas A. Linthorst is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice. Mr. Linthorst represents employers in a broad array of labor and employment law matters.  Mr. Linthorst represents employers before state and federal trial and appellate courts and administrative agencies. His practice is concentrated in defending employers against wage and hour class and collective actions, whistleblower claims, and claims for wrongful termination, sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 


About the Author


Michelle Seldin Silverman is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice. Ms. Silverman represents and counsels employers in all aspects of labor and employment law, including employment-related litigation and the preparation of employment policies, manuals, and agreements.


About the Author


James P. Walsh, Jr. is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice. Mr. Walsh represents employers in a broad array of labor and employment law matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies, as well as in FINRA and AAA arbitrations. 


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.