Advertisement

May 21, 2013

New Michigan Air Rules Require Title V (ROP) Permits for Greenhouse Gases

Under new rules, Michigan facilities that were minor sources may now become major sources solely because of their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Michigan is amending its air quality rules to comply with recent federal changes that would require facilities that were not subject to Title V permit requirements (known as Renewable Operating Permits (ROPs) in Michigan) to apply for a Title V ROP by July 2012 if their GHG potential to emit exceeds the thresholds. The rules also incorporate new emissions thresholds for the pollutant PM 2.5.

Facilities must calculate source-wide potential to emit GHGs on a mass basis and a carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e) basis . The major source thresholds are source-wide potential to emit of greater than or equal to 100 tpy GHG on a mass basis, and 100,000 tpy CO2e. If these thresholds are exceeded, the facility may have to submit an ROP application by July 1, 2012. The DEQ has announced a public hearing on these rule changes for May 3, 2012, 1:00 PM in the Art Iverson conference room, Constitution Hall, Lansing. Written comments will be accepted until 5:00 PM on May 3.

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

Tim Lundgren is a partner in the Environmental Practice Group and chair of the firm's Water Law Specialty Area. Tim works on matters related to water quality and water supply and use, including discharge permitting and compliance, stormwater compliance, and water withdrawal. He has assisted clients with waterfront and port facilities on permitting and compliance matters both on inland waterways and on the Great Lakes, and with spill...

616/336-6750

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.