Advertisement

May 20, 2013

New PBGC Guidance Provides Premium Penalty Relief for Certain Late Payments and for Faulty Alternative Premium Funding Target Elections

PBGC recently published guidance granting additional relief from penalties associated with late payment of premiums and in situations where a pension plan fails to comply with the mechanics for electing the alternative premium funding target to calculate the variable rate premium.  The following summarizes the available relief and eligibility requirements.

On September 14, 2011, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) issued a notice (Notice) that provides relief to pension plans from penalties associated with certain late payment of premiums and situations involving the failure to properly elect the alternative premium funding target (APFT) to calculate the variable rate premium (VRP).  According to PBGC’s press release, the agency was granting premium-related relief as part of a continuing effort to ease regulatory burdens on its customers.  Plan sponsors and industry groups continue to request that the PBGC expand premium penalty relief beyond the situations described below.

Relief from Late Payment of Premiums Penalty—the Seven Day Rule

Generally, PBGC assesses a late payment charge, composed of separate penalty and interest components, when the required annual premium payment is not timely made.  PBGC may waive the penalty component, but not the interest component, upon a showing of reasonable cause and under certain other circumstances outlined in the premium payment regulations.

The Notice provides that for plan years beginning after 2010, PBGC will automatically waive premium payment penalties that are assessed solely because a premium payment was late by not more than seven calendar days.  The relief does not apply to late payment interest charges.  A filer who submits a premium payment that is delinquent by more than seven calendar days may seek reconsideration of the late payment penalty under the premium payment regulations.

While this relief may seem minor at first blush, it is valuable because PBGC premium payment penalties are based on the number of months from the due date to the date of payment, “counting any portion of a month as a full month … .”  In other words, absent this relief, a payment that is only one day late could potentially trigger a penalty for a full month.

Relief for Improper APFT Elections

For plan years after 2007, PBGC premium regulations allow pension plans to elect the APFT to calculate the VRP.  Pension plans elect the APFT method by checking Box 5 in Part II of the premium filing form.  A number of pension plans failed to properly elect the APFT method for plan years 2008 and 2009.  In response, PBGC issued Technical Update 10-2 under which a pension plan was deemed to have made a valid election for the 2008 or 2009 plan year provided certain conditions were met. 

The Notice provides further relief for pension plans that did not qualify under Technical Update 10-2 as well as expands upon such relief for plan years after 2009.  Under the Notice, relief is available when a pension plan uses the APFT method to determine VRP for the plan year without filing a valid election for the current or a prior plan year.  PBGC determines the appropriate VRP determination method solely by reference to the information reported on Line 7d(1) of Part III.  If “alternative” is selected, PBGC treats the plan as if it elected the APFT method.

In addition, the Notice provides limited relief to those pension plans that submit an otherwise valid APFT election after the filing due date.  This relief is available when the delinquent filing is not an amendment of a timely filing in which the pension plan elected the standard method and the delinquent filing is submitted by the earlier of the 90th day after the due date or the 30th day after receiving notice from PBGC that the filing was delinquent.

Pension plans that are entitled to either form of relief will be contacted by PBGC to explain the options and actions required.  Those pension plans not entitled to relief under the notice may seek reconsideration based on the facts and circumstances.

Relief from Late Payment Penalty for 2008 and 2009 Plan Years

Pension plans that did not qualify for relief under Technical Update 10-2 and pension plans for which PBGC denied any requests for reconsideration (or such requests were not submitted) were required to amend their premium filing and recalculate VRP using the standard method.  This recalculation often resulted in additional premium liability that was paid after the due date and was subject to late payment charges.  Under the Notice, for 2008 and 2009 plan years, PBGC waives the premium penalty that results from the recalculation of VRP for such pension plans.

PBGC will contact pension plans entitled to penalty relief.  Pension plans that already paid the late payment penalty will receive a credit that can be used to offset future premiums.  Pension plans that have yet to amend their 2008 or 2009 filings to recognize the additional premium liability will receive the waiver if the filing is amended and the additional premium paid within 30 days of the date PBGC notifies the plan that it is entitled to relief.

© 2013 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Partner

Joseph S. Adams is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Joe focuses his practice on employee benefits and executive compensation matters for public, private and tax-exempt organizations

312-984-7790

About the Author

Counsel

Maureen O'Brien is counsel in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  She focuses her practice on advising clients on a broad range of employee benefits matters, including qualified plan design, welfare plan design, employee benefit plan compliance issues, fiduciary matters, multiemployer pension plan issues and nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

312-984-3242

Contributors

Associate

Patrick D. Ryan is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  He focuses his practice on employee benefits matters related to pension plans, 401(k) plans, executive compensation arrangements, and cafeteria and welfare plans.

312-984-7628

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.