Advertisement

April 17, 2014

New Regulations on Equity Contribution Issued by China’s MOFCOM

New provisions significantly improve the ability of foreign investors to create new enterprises, merge existing enterprises

On September 21, 2012, the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) issued the Interim Provisions of the on Equity Contribution of Foreign-invested Enterprises (“Interim Provisions”), which came into effect on October 22, 2012. The Interim Provisions provide an application procedure and a policy basis for Chinese and foreign investors to contribute capital in the form of equity interest to an enterprise in China. These provisions significantly improve the ability of foreign investors to create new enterprises or to merge existing enterprises, in turn facilitating business expansion without requiring large amounts of upfront cash.

Below are some highlights of the Interim Provisions:

1. Contributing capital in the form of an equity interest to a PRC enterprise (“Equity Enterprise”), regardless if its shareholders are Chinese or foreign investors, to establish or modify the shareholdings of a FIE (“Invested Enterprise”) shall be subject to the relevant regulations of the Interim Provisions.

2. Equity interest in real-estate enterprises, foreign-invested companies and foreign-invested venture (equity) enterprises shall not be used as capital contribution. Furthermore, Article 24 of the Interim Provision implies that neither the Chinese shareholders nor the foreign investors of a foreign-investment-real-estate enterprise shall use their equity interest to make contributions to either a FIE or a domestic enterprise.

3. Equity interest used for capital contribution shall be appraised by a qualified Chinese valuation institution. The amount of equity interest contributed to the registered capital of the Invested Enterprise shall be no higher than the appraised valuation amount.

4. The Interim Provisions detail the forum and procedure for application to MOFCOM for an equity contribution to an Invested Enterprise. Specifically, the provincial-level MOFCOM branch in charge of the Invested Enterprise must approve the formation or change to the capital structure of an FIE through capital contribution of equity interest, unless MOFCOM’s approval is explicitly required. The Interim Provisions provide the following specific procedure to acquire that approval: (a) The foreign investor should file with the approval authority of the Invested Enterprise; (b) if the Equity Enterprise is a FIE and its formation was approved by a separate authority, however, then the Invested Enterprise’s approval authorities should consult the Equity Enterprise’s approval authorities about the capital increase; (c) if everything is in order, then the approval authority of the Invested Enterprise authorizing the capital increase should issue or amend the FIE’s Approval Certificate and mark it “capital contribution with equity unpaid”; (d) the Equity Enterprise then applies to its own approval authorities for a change in shareholder with the aforementioned Approval Certificate; and (e) the Invested Enterprise should finally apply for the revised Approval Certificate of the FIE with the Invested Enterprise’s approval authorities (marked with “capital contribution with equity paid”).

5. The Interim Provisions create two different definitions for “total investment.” Generally, “total investment” includes 100 percent of registered capital. The meaning changes, however, when calculating the total investment for the purposes of determining the amount of foreign debt and duty-free import the enterprise can take on. Namely, total investment will be determined by the registered capital less the equity interest contributed by a foreign party.

6. Foreign investors may use their equity interest in a domestic entity as consideration for other investors’ equity interests in a different domestic enterprise and in the acquisition of a listed company’s shares.

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Dawn Zhang is a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig's Shanghai office. She has broad experience advising clients on venture capital, China-related cross-border mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, joint ventures, and general corporate matters. Before joining Greenberg Traurig, Dawn practiced in other international law firms for many years and served as the PRC legal counsel for a multinational corporation, where she handled a wide variety of corporate matters for public and emerging growth companies. Dawn passed the national PRC judicial qualification examination in 1998 and was...

86 (21) 6391-6633

About the Author

Shareholder

George Qi is a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig's Shanghai office. He focuses his practice primarily on China-related cross-border mergers and acquisitions, capital market, corporate finance and general corporate matters. He has wide-ranging experience advising multinational companies in acquisitions and otherwise doing business in China, and in advising Chinese private companies in raising capital in overseas capital markets.

86 21 6391-5073

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.