April 19, 2014

New USPTO Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Satellite Office Finds Home in Downtown Dallas Location

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently announced that downtown Dallas will serve as the site for its Dallas-Fort Worth regional satellite office. The office is expected to be a place where small businesses and entrepreneurs can learn how to navigate the patent process, meet with examiners, and access USPTO's comprehensive search databases. It will also serve as a patent examination office for technology developed in the region and throughout the South. It is also expected to provide an economic boost of over $400 million dollars to the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex.

Purpose of the Satellite Office Program

As a part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, Congress required the USPTO to establish three satellite offices by September 2014, allowing the USPTO to increase outreach activities, enhance examiner retention, improve examiner-recruiting, decrease the patent application backlog, and improve patent examination quality. The satellite offices are part of the Department of Commerce's ongoing effort to create new economic opportunities by getting regional entrepreneurs the patents they need in order to attract investment capital, activate their business plans, and help create more well-paying jobs.

The creation of satellite offices marks the first time in the USPTO's 200-year history its operations have expanded outside Washington D.C. By bringing portions of the USPTO closer to its customers, the USPTO believes the satellite offices will serve as "hubs of innovation and creativity, helping protect and foster American innovation in the global marketplace, helping businesses cut through red tape, and creating new economic opportunities in each of the local communities" and will focus on more regional technologies as it becomes more established. With new regional offices and several hundred additional examiners, the USPTO hopes to reduce the time it takes an inventor to get a patent approved, currently averaging three years, as well as address the backlog of roughly 620,000 pending patents.  This backlog relief and other regional benefits will be welcomed throughout southwest regions of the US.

Selection of the Terminal Annex Federal Building

According to Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO David Kappos, the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex "is exceedingly rich in engineering talent, patent applicants, and patent grants, and boasts an above average population of potential Veteran employees. We are already underway identifying leadership who know the unique contours of the business landscape to staff the new satellite offices. The USPTO is committed to making certain that American businesses and entrepreneurs have all of the resources they need to grow, create jobs and compete globally."

When selecting the location for the satellite office, the USPTO worked with the General Services Administration (GSA), considering locations which were centrally located, affordable, and well suited to the USPTO's needs. They ultimately selected the Dealey Plaza location, because the Terminal Annex Federal Building met all federal regulations for leasing space and was the most affordable. The Dallas-Fort Worth satellite office will be modeled after the USPTO's Detroit satellite office, which opened in July 2012 and is scheduled to employ more than 100 patent examiners and 20 administrative patent judges by next summer.

© 2014 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author


Michael Pegues has 20 years experience in complex business litigation, with an emphasis on patent litigation. He has also litigated cases involving copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets. Mr. Pegues actively consults and works closely with various types of clients on matters of protecting and enhancing the economic value of their intellectual property. Mr. Pegues is a former judicial clerk for the Honorable Richard A. Schell of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.


About the Author


Jason Wietjes has experience with all aspects of intellectual property law including the litigation of intellectual property cases, licensing, and patent and trademark prosecution.  Mr. Wietjes' practice includes all facets of intellectual property litigation with an emphasis on the representation of plaintiffs and defendants in complex patent disputes involving a broad range of technologies.

While attending the University of Nebraska, Mr. Wietjes worked in the University's Biological Process Development Facility, a leading...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.