Advertisement

May 22, 2013

The Next .Step in Internet Expansion

From January 12, 2012 to May 30, 2012, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) accepted applications for new generic top-level domain names (gTLDs) from individuals, companies, and organizations worldwide. A gTLD is the term appearing to the right of the dot, such as com, net, and org. Although not every gTLD application will mature into a gTLD registration, as a result of the 1,930 new gTLD applications, the range of gTLDs will expand dramatically from the current total of roughly two dozen.

On June 13, 2012, ICANN released a list of the applied-for gTLDs and the companies who have applied to run them. This list is relevant for monitoring direct infringements of a client’s brand name(s) and provides useful reconnaissance on industry trends and competitor behavior. Therefore, clients are encouraged to review this list closely; it is available on ICANN’s website at http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc13jun12-en(http://t.co/POdsltrQ) (or by contacting your GT attorney).

  • Legal Rights Objections: appropriate where the applied-for gTLD infringes the legal rights (e.g., trademark rights, right of publicity) of a brand owner. These disputes will be resolved by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO);
  • Community Objections: appropriate where an established institution associated with a clearly-defined community objects to a gTLD application. These disputes will be resolved by the International Chamber of Commerce;
  • String Confusion Objections: appropriate where the applied-for gTLD is confusingly similar to another applied-for gTLD or existing gTLD. These disputes will be resolved by the International Centre for Dispute Resolution; and
  • Limited Public Interest Objections: appropriate where the applied-for gTLD is contrary to generally-accepted legal norms of morality and public order. These disputes will be resolved by the International Chamber of Commerce.

After an objection is filed, the gTLD applicant may (1) withdraw its application, (2) attempt to reach a settlement with the party that has objected, or (3) file a response to the objection and enter the dispute resolution process.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Kristen Fancher focuses her practice on brand management and the development, protection and exploitation of trademarks and other intellectual property.  Her experience includes counseling clients on trademark availability and filing strategy in the U.S. and throughout the world, domain name and Internet intellectual property issues, copyright protection and the enforcement of intellectual property rights. She also practices in the areas of transactional intellectual property and entertainment, with an emphasis on monetizing intellectual property through licensing and other strategic...

678-553-2457

About the Author

Associate

Joel Feldman is a member of the firm’s Intellectual Property & Technology and Entertainment practice groups. He counsels companies, organizations, and individuals on the protection of their intellectual property rights. He focuses his practice on establishing effective domestic and international trademark and copyright portfolios and resolving intellectual property controversies between his clients and third parties, including trademark, copyright, domain-name, and right-of-publicity disputes.

678.553.4778

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.