May 24, 2012

Ninth Circuit Rules That State Social Workers Are Not "Learned Professionals" Exempt from Overtime Pay

On September 9, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Washington State social workers are not “learned professionals” exempt from FLSA overtime pay requirements, despite “rigorous” educational and training requirements for the positions (Solis v. Washington).  Candidates for the position of Social Worker 2 were required to have a bachelor’s degree in social services, human services, behavioral sciences, or a related field, as well as eighteen months as a Social Worker 1 or two years of equivalent work experience. Candidates for Social Worker 3 were required to have additional experience beyond that of the Social Worker 2 position.  Additionally, new employees in those positions had to complete six more weeks of training once they are hired.

In siding with the DOL, the Ninth Circuit relied on two DOL opinion letters, which had found that a position requiring social workers to have a master’s degree in certain related fields met the criteria for exemption, but that a position requiring a bachelor’s degree did not, because an undergraduate degree did not rise to the level of specialized academic training required by the regulations to trigger the exemption.  The court noted that the education requirements for the social worker positions were not sufficiently specialized to qualify for the exemption.  On-the-job training and related work experience cannot be substituted for the requisite specialized academic training.

FLSA exemptions are narrowly construed against employers. Employers must therefore be very careful when analyzing whether to apply any overtime exemption.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Virginia E. Robinson focuses her practice in the areas of labor and employment and civil litigation. Virginia has a strong courtroom background, and she assists clients with a variety of employment issues, including claims of discrimination and retaliation.

703-749-1385

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.