Advertisement

May 19, 2013

NLRA Posters: Requirement to Post Delayed Again

On April 17, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit enjoined the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) Notice Posting rule that requires employers large enough to be subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB to post a Notice to Employees advising them of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act.

Previously set to take effect on April 30, 2012, and already delayed by the NLRB from a January 31, 2012 effective date, the rule recently suffered two major setbacks. On March 2, 2012 the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia invalidated the penalty provisions of the rule, while upholding the posting requirement itself. However, on April 13, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina held that the NLRB lacked the authority to require employers to post notices in the workplace informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and struck down the rule in its entirety. 

The Court of Appeals ordered the rule enjoined until it has had an opportunity to consider the merits of the case. Oral arguments are scheduled to take place in September 2012.

Consequently, employers no longer have to implement the Notice Posting at their workplace by the April 30, 2012 effective date as the NLRB's regional offices will not implement the rule until the matter has been decided by the Court of Appeals.

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Associate

Luis focuses his practice on immigration and refugee law, international law, civil liberties, and international trade and finance. He has first chair trial experience in a wide variety of employment and immigration-based cases, as well as I-9 audits, visas, waivers, adjustments of status and naturalization matters. He is fluent in Spanish and English.

Luis’ experience spans the United States, Mexico and Europe. With a background in international business law and finance, Luis worked for a large international corporate law firm in Mexico City where he worked on foreign direct...

616-336-6742

About the Author

Partner

Dave’s “client-centered” practice involves a variety of labor and employment issues. He provides practical and confidential ongoing advice and consulting on a number of sensitive and complex labor and employment matters, from problem employee situations to multi-facility collective bargaining negotiations. His representative clients include diverse industries (such as automotive, printing,...

616-336-6608

Contributors

Partner

Dick Hooker has had significant experience in traditional labor relations, state/federal agency work, employment litigation, union election campaigns, unemployment insurance taxation matters, and arbitration of employment disputes. He is a facilitative mediator for the U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan and the Michigan Courts, and he is listed as an...

248-567-7429

About the Author

Partner

Pat White's practice concentrates on the full spectrum of civil rights issues, race and gender disability matters, free speech and electronic privacy issues in the workplace. In addition to litigation, he also does traditional labor work, including negotiation and arbitration, both for public and private sector clients. He also maintains expertise in education law, representing school districts, community colleges and colleges and universities, both with respect to employment issues as well...

616/336-6615

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.