Advertisement

May 24, 2013

NLRB Enjoined from Enforcing Notice-Posting Rule Pending Appeal

D.C. Circuit Order prevents the Board from enforcing rule until the court resolves all of the issues before it; oral arguments scheduled for September 2012.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today has entered an Order enjoining the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) from enforcing its final rule (the Rule) requiring all employers subject to the Board's jurisdiction to post a notice in the workplace informing employees of certain of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

The request for an injunction came before the D.C. Circuit as part of the National Association of Manufacturers' appeal of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia's decision upholding the Rule's notice-posting requirements, but striking down two of its key enforcement mechanisms.[1]

While the district court had denied a previous request for an injunction pending the appeal of its decision, the D.C. Circuit reached a different conclusion and entered an Order enjoining the Board from enforcing the Rule until the court resolves all of the issues on appeal. In reaching its decision, the D.C. Circuit cited (1) the April 13 decision handed down by Judge David C. Norton of the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina striking down the Rule in its entirety;[2] (2) the "tension" between the Board's argument that the Rule should take effect during the pendency of the appeal and its prior voluntary postponement of the operation of the Rule during the proceedings before the district court; and (3) the Board's indication that it may cross-appeal the district court's decision striking down the Rule's enforcement mechanisms.

The D.C. Circuit's Order also set an expedited schedule for consideration of the appeal, with oral argument to be held in September of this year. Therefore, the injunction against enforcement of the Rule will remain in place at least until September 2012. This temporarily resolves the conflict between the two district court decisions. Employers will not be required to post the notice until September 2012 or later, if at all, depending on the timing and content of the D.C. Circuit's decision.


1]. See our LawFlash regarding that decision, "D.C. Court Issues Split Decision in NLRB Notice Case" (Mar. 6, 2012), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/LEPG_LF_SplitDecisioninNLRBNoticeCase_06march12.

[2]. See our LawFlash regarding that decision, "South Carolina Court Strikes Down NLRB Notice-Posting Rule" (Apr. 16, 2012), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/LEPG_LF_SCCourtStrikesDownNLRBRule_16apr12.

Copyright © 2013 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

The Morgan Lewis Labor and Employment Practice strives for excellence in client service. For more than half a century, our lawyers have helped clients negotiate the ever-changing landscape of federal, state, and local laws that govern the workplace. We get to know you, your business, and your industry, and assist you in devising solutions to employment problems that affect the efficiency and productivity of your workforce.

215.963.5000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.