May 24, 2012

NLRB Finalizes “Ambush Election” Regulation

On December 20, 2011 the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") finalized its “ambush election” regulation, dramatically reducing the period between the filing of a labor union’s petition to represent employees and the election to determine whether the union should be certified. The text of the final regulation was published in the Federal Register and can be found HERE. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other associations have already filed suit in federal court to block the implementation of the regulation. This action by the NLRB was anticipated given the immanency of the conclusion of Member Craig Becker’s recess appointment to the NLRB.

On November 30, 2011 the NLRB published a “resolution” that was passed by a 2-1 vote. The resolution forecast the composition of a revised regulation that would shorten the period between the filing of a representation petition by a labor organization and the timing of an election among employees to determine if the union should be certified. The resolution also forecast the limitation of appeal rights by a party to a representation election. If you are currently the subject of an organizing effort the finalization of this rule could dramatically affect the timing of the election at your business and your rights in that process.

Upon concluding our analysis we will report on the sections of the regulation our clients need to be aware of.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Mark Carter is a Labor Partner with a national practice. Mark advises clients on all aspects of traditional labor and employment law. He has extensive experience in litigating before the federal trial and appellate courts, the National Labor Relations Board, arbitrations, and in collective bargaining. Mark has also litigated numerous damage actions involving strike misconduct under the RICO Act and other federal labor laws in Alaska, Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas,...

304-357-0924

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.