May 24, 2012

NLRB Moves Date for Posting Notice of Unionization Rights to January 31, 2012

On August 20, 2011, we published an update regarding the new National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requirement that all employers who are subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB must post a notice of employee rights, including the right to unionize, in the workplace. The original due date for the posting was November 14, 2011. However, the NLRB has since announced that it has moved the posting due date to January 31, 2012. Everything else about the requirement stays the same.

Although most private sector employers - regardless of whether they are unionized - will be required to post the notice, there is no need to post it before January 31, 2012. The National Association of Manufacturers and the National Federation of Independent Business have filed lawsuits against the NLRB seeking to enjoin enforcement of the rule on the grounds that it exceeds the NLRB’s statutory authority.

The Department of Labor’s posting obligation as it relates to federal contractors, under Executive Order 13496 for federal contractors to post notices of employees’ NLRA rights, went into effect on June 21, 2010, and is not being challenged.

Also, according to the NLRB rule, a federal contractor who has complied with the Department of Labor’s notice posting requirement will be deemed in compliance with the NLRB’s notice posting requirement.

Copies of the poster and requirements are now available for downloading and printing on the NLRB website.

© 2012 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Counsel

Judy K. Jetelina has practiced in the area of labor and employment law for more than 20 years. She represents management in the full range of labor and employment matters, including state and federal court litigation, and proceedings before federal and state administrative agencies. Ms. Jetelina primarily focuses on motion practice with particular experience in summary judgments and Rule 12 dismissals and removals.

Ms. Jetelina has knowledge of matters arising under federal and state discrimination laws and state employment tort laws, the...

210.299.3520
Partner

Robert Nichols represents employers in litigation, administrative actions and arbitrations concerning discrimination and retaliation, harassment, wrongful discharge, occupational safety and health, union-management relations, wage and hour matters, and other concerns related to employment. Mr. Nichols has defended more than 200 employment-related lawsuits in federal and state court, represented employers in more than 300 federal and state agency employment discrimination investigations, and handled numerous Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cases,...

713.221.1259

About the Author

Counsel

John A. Ferguson Jr. advises employers on all aspects of traditional labor and employment law, and has developed a specific litigation capability in defending employers before state and federal courts, state and federal administrative agencies, in hearings, arbitrations and collective bargaining. Client representation includes issues of workers’ compensation retaliation, the National Labor Relations Association (NLRA), Texas Labor Code, Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and...

210.299.3518

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.