Advertisement

July 28, 2014

NLRB Orders Bilingual "Shaming"

On June 25, 2012, the NLRB overruled an ALJ's rejection of a requested "shaming"  order and required that the CEO of a California employer read its order aloud to company employees in both Spanish and English.

In Marquez Brothers Enterprisesfound here, the ALJ found that the employer committed multiple unfair labor practices, but concluded that “there is nothing extraordinary about the unfair labor practices committed" and thus did not address the General Counsel's request for an order requiring a remedial notice to be read to employees. Instead the ALJ ordered the more common posting of a notice. The Board, however, disagreed with the ALJ and found that the violations found by the ALJ (including veiled threats, the termination of two pro-union employees, and "an orchestrated effort to coerce all the employees whom it believed had signed union authorization cards into sending revocation letters to the union") were “sufficiently serious and widespread” in their impact to make a notice-reading requirement appropriate in that case. Accordingly, the Board ordered that a remedial notice "be read aloud to the Respondent’s employees by the Respondent’s chief executive officer or, at the Respondent’s option, by a Board agent in that officer’s presence" in English and Spanish.

While such an order by the Board is not unheard of, its adoption by the Board is a relatively recent phenomenon. It is notable in this case because the ALJ had concluded the ULPs were not extraordinary. The lone Republican on the current Board, Member Hayes, wrote in his dissent while he concurred in the findings that the conduct violated the Act, he would not have "impose[d] the extraordinary requirement of  a public reading to remedy them."

© 2014 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Steve Hernandez, Labor and Employment, Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law firm
Associate

Steve L. Hernández is an associate in the Los Angeles office of Barnes & Thornburg. A member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Department, Mr. Hernández focuses his practice on traditional labor and employment law. Mr. Hernández has extensive experience litigating class action matters.

Mr. Hernández also brings four years of experience as an attorney with Region 21 of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to his practice. While at the NLRB, Mr. Hernández investigated unfair labor practice, litigated unfair labor practice...

310-284-3775

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 W