Advertisement

May 25, 2013

No Need To Record An Assignment Of A Deed Of Trust Prior To Foreclosure

In Calvo v. HSBC Bank USA, --- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, 2011 WL 4035791 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2011), the California Court of Appeal affirmed the longstanding rule that an assignee of a beneficiary under a deed of trust need not record its beneficial interest prior to initiating foreclosure. In Calvo, the plaintiff argued the foreclosure sale of her property was void because HSBC did not record the assignment of the beneficial interest from the original lender to HSBC. She claimed this violated California Civil Code Section 2932.5. Like the lower court, the Court of Appeal found "no merit" to her claims.

In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeal relied on the plain language of Civil Code Section 2932.5. That section requires the recording of a beneficial interest in real property prior to foreclosure only when "the power of sale is given to a mortgagee, or other encumbrancer." Since 1908, however, this requirement applies only to mortgages, not to deeds of trust. Under a deed of trust, title to the encumbered property is transferred to a trustee, who also exercises the power of sale. A mortgage, however, is a lien on real property, title of which remains with the borrower. Over the course of the last century, "deeds of trust have largely replaced mortgages as the primary real property security device." As a result, Section 2932.5 has become "practically obsolete." For these reasons, the plaintiff had no legal basis to set aside the trustee's sale following foreclosure. 

Calvo v. HSBC Bank USA, --- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, 2011 WL 4035791 (Cal.App. 2 Dis. 2011) 

Copyright © 2013, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Associate

 

Mr. Moreno is an associate in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's San Diego office.

619-338-6664

About the Author

Partner

Shannon Z. Petersen is a partner in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's San Diego office.

619-338-6656

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.