Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Northwest Indiana and Northeast Illinois Counties Designated as Nonattainment for Ozone Despite Conflicting Data

On May 31, 2012, and just formally published at 77 Fed. Reg. at 34221 (June 11, 2012), EPA designated the northwest Indiana counties Lake and Porter as marginal nonattainment for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). On April 30, 2012, EPA promulgated the initial ozone air quality designations for the country but at that time was still working on the designations for counties in the Chicago-Naperville area. In addition to Lake and Porter, the Illinois counties of Cook, DuPage, Grundy (partial), Kane, Kendall (partial), Lake, McHenry, and Will are also designated as nonattainment. Indiana’s Dearborn County was listed on April 30, as being partially in nonattainment.

EPA’s work on the 2008 ozone designations began with its issuance of a Dec. 4, 2008 guidance memorandum regarding air quality designations which also included a request for states to propose designations by March 12, 2009. IDEM responded with its recommendations on March 11, 2009, which, based on existing monitoring data at that time, proposed that only Lake County be considered nonattainment in northwest Indiana. On Dec. 9, 2011, EPA proposed an air quality designation that did not place any county in northwest Indiana in nonattainment. On Jan. 31, 2012, EPA provided a notice of revised air quality designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS which, this time, included Lake, Porter, and Jasper Indiana counties. On April 13, 2012, IDEM Commissioner, Tom Easterly, submitted a forty-page document challenging EPA’s designation for Lake, Porter, and Jasper counties on the basis that the current data from ozone monitors located in those counties have shown compliance with the 2008 NAAQS for ozone. Only one of the 22 monitors in the area registered ozone levels above the applicable standard. That monitor was located in the northeast corner of Illinois and measured an ozone value of 0.4 of 1 ppb (parts per billion) above the standard of 75 ppb. An analysis performed by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management attributes that exceedence to a change in Illinois’s automotive inspection program.

In EPA’s response to Indiana’s April 13, 2012 comments, EPA maintained the nonattainment designations for Lake and Porter counties stating that “we believe that the Indiana counties contribute to violations at the violating monitor” and that “Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to designate as nonattainment any area that does not meet the air quality standard or that contributes to a violation of the air quality standard in a nearby area.” Responses to Significant Comments 2008 Ozone NAAQS Addendum for Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI area, May 31, 2012, pg 3 of 47.

As a result of this nonattainment designation, Indiana will have to formally submit an air quality data plan to show to EPA that Lake and Porter counties are meeting the NAAQS ozone standard, something which already exists. Although Indiana will not have to promulgate any additional air emission controls in order to reach compliance, nonattainment counties have more stringent air permitting requirements that will be an extra burden on economic expansion in northwest Indiana. Specifically, new sources of air emissions in a nonattainment area are required to implement the lowest achievable emission rate and will have to offset any emission increases.

The effective date of the rule is July 20, 2012.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Associate

Mindy L. Boehr is an associate in the Indianapolis, Indiana office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, where she is a member of the firm’s Environmental Law Department. She has advised clients on liability exposure related to the presence of hazardous substances becoming located on personal property.

317-231-7798

About the Author

Associate

Joel T. Bowers is an associate in the South Bend, Indiana office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, and a member of the firm’s Environmental and Litigation Departments.

574-237-1287

Contributors

Partner

Charles M. Denton is a partner in the Grand Rapids office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP and is an administrator of the firm’s Environmental Law Department in Michigan and Northern Indiana. He focuses his practice on environmental agency enforcement defense, toxic torts and class action litigation, “Brownfields” redevelopment, compliance counseling, insurance coverage, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

616-742-3974

About the Author

Of Counsel

Guinn P. Doyle, of counsel in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis, Indiana office, concentrates his practice in environmental and OSHA law. He joined Barnes & Thornburg in 1987 following 11½ years with the Indiana State Board of Health and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Mr. Doyle served as an environmental regulatory analyst with Barnes & Thornburg while attending law school.

His career in environmental management began in 1975 inspecting land disposal facilities for the Indiana State Board of Health. Following the passage of the...

317-231-7449

About the Author

Associate

Timothy A. Haley is an associate in the Environmental Department in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis, Indiana office.

317-231-6493

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.