Advertisement

May 20, 2013

Notice of Tax Lien Foreclosure to Mortgage Holders is Determined by the Address in the Mortgage

A Wisconsin appeals court recently ruled that a county foreclosing a tax lien need look no further than the recorded mortgage to find the address for notice of the foreclosure to a mortgage holder. If the mortgage contains no address, then notice of the tax lien foreclosure need not be sent to the mortgage holder.

Foreclosure by the government for failure to pay taxes is a drastic measure, and requires strict compliance by the government with statutory procedures. Wis. Stat. section 75.521(3) sets out the notice requirements that counties must follow to commence tax lien foreclosure proceedings, including notices that must be sent to property owners and those with mortgages or other liens on or interests in the property.

In Juneau County v. Associated Bank, N.A., 2012AP1304 (Jan. 31, 2013), the court concluded that under the statute, "the county was not required . . . to search beyond those records located in the office of the register of deeds and related to the affected parcels in order to ascertain the bank’s address." Because the mortgages recorded by the bank did not contain the bank’s address, the county strictly complied with the statute when it classified the bank as having an "unknown address" in the tax lien foreclosure proceeding.

The bank contended that the statute should not be read in such a limited fashion, and that the county had actual and constructive knowledge of the bank’s address. The bank had previously sent tax payments for the parcels to the county (containing the bank’s address on the envelope and on the check that paid the taxes), and had included the bank’s address on a foreclosure complaint relating to the affected parcels.

The court was unconvinced. Not only does the statute not require that the county look beyond the recorded mortgage, but the court concluded that requiring a further search "is also unreasonable because it provides no guidance on the parameters of the required search, and no apparent stopping point."

To assure receipt of notice of tax lien foreclosures, mortgages, assignments of leases and rents and other lien documents should contain the address of the secured party.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Ann Ustad Smith Attorney Michael Best Friedrich LLP
Partner

Ann Smith practices in the areas of bankruptcy, commercial litigation (primarily related to lending, fraud and contract disputes), commercial transactions (including financings, asset sales, liquidations and related matters, especially involving distressed businesses) and constitutional litigation. She is regularly involved in workouts, foreclosures (including receiverships and emergency orders), replevins, bankruptcy proceedings (including motions for relief from stay, cash collateral and adequate protection matters, Chapter 11 plan confirmation matters and purchase of assets out of...

608-283-2251

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.