April 15, 2014

Notification Threshold Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Increased to $70.9 million

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced revised thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR) and 2013 thresholds for determining whether parties trigger the prohibition against interlocking directors under Section 8 of the Clayton Act.

Notification Threshold Adjustments

Pursuant to the amendments passed by the U.S. Congress in 2000, the FTC published revised thresholds for HSR pre-merger notifications in the Federal Register on January 11, 2013.  These revised thresholds will become effective on February 11, 2013.  Any transaction completed and any HSR pre-merger notifications filed on or after February 11, 2013, must comply with these new thresholds.

As required, the FTC adjusted the notification thresholds based on the change in the gross national product (GNP) for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012.  Most notably, the base filing threshold of $50 million, which frequently determines whether a transaction requires filing of an HSR notification, will increase from $68.2 million to $70.9 million.  The changes also will affect other dollar-amount thresholds:

  • The alternative statutory size-of-transaction test, which captures all transactions valued above $200 million regardless of the “size-of-persons,” will be adjusted to $283.6 million.
  • The statutory size-of-person thresholds (applicable to transactions valued at less than $283.6 million, but more than $70.9 million) will increase from $13.6 million to $14.2 million and from $136.4 million to $141.8 million.

The adjustments will affect parties contemplating HSR notifications in various ways.  Parties may be relieved from the obligation to file a notification for transactions closed on or after February 11, 2013, that result in holdings below the adjusted base threshold.  For example, a transaction resulting in the acquiring person holding voting securities or assets valued at less than $70.9 million would not be reportable on or after the effective date.  The adjustments will also affect various exemptions under the HSR rules.  For example, acquisitions by U.S. persons of foreign assets and voting securities of foreign issuers will now be exempt unless they generated U.S. sales in excess of $70.9 million or, in the case of foreign voting securities, the issuer has assets in the United States valued in excess of $70.9 million.

Parties may also realize a benefit of lower notification filing fees for transactions that just cross current thresholds.  Under the rules, the acquiring person must pay a filing fee, although the parties may allocate that fee amongst themselves.  Filing fees for HSR-reportable transactions will remain unchanged for now (although the FTC is pursuing filing fee increases).  However, the applicable filing fee tiers will shift upward as a result of the GNP-indexing adjustments:

  • Transactions valued at or in excess of $70.9 million, but less than $141.8 million require a $45,000 filing fee.
  • Transactions valued at or in excess of $141.8 million, but less than $709.1 million require a $125,000 filing fee.
  • Transactions valued at or above $709.1 million require a $280,000 filing fee.

Interlocking Directorate Thresholds Adjustment

On January 14, 2013, the FTC published revised thresholds for interlocking directorates, which are effective immediately.  The FTC revises these thresholds annually based on the change in the level of GNP.  Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits a person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if certain thresholds are met.  The prohibition against interlocking directors applies if each corporation has more than $10 million (as adjusted) in capital, surplus and undivided profits; however, the prohibition does not apply if either corporation has less than $1 million (as adjusted) in competitive sales.  Pursuant to the recently revised thresholds, Section 8 of the Clayton Act applies to corporations with more than $28,883,000 in capital, surplus and undivided profits, while it does not apply where either corporation has less than $2,888,300 in competitive sales.

© 2014 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author


Jon B. Dubrow is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm's Washington, D.C. office.  He focuses his practice on defending mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures before the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and foreign competition authorities, as well as antitrust and commercial litigation.  Jon also provides counseling on distribution issues and a wide variety of other competition-related matters.


About the Author

Carla A. R. Hine, Antitrust Attorney, McDermott Will Law Firm

Carla A. R. Hine is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C., office.  She focuses her practice on antitrust and consumer protection regulatory matters.

In her antitrust practice, Carla has significant experience counseling clients on matters relating to mergers and acquisitions, collaborations, and compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act and international merger notification regimes.  She defends mergers and acquisitions before the U.S. antitrust agencies and international competition authorities...

202 756 8095

Joseph F. Winterscheid is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Washington, D.C., office.  Joe is head of the Firm’s global Antitrust & Competition Practice Group and his practice focuses on U.S. and international antitrust law.  From 1989 to 1994, Joe was partner-in-charge of an international law office in Brussels, where his practice focused on representing clients in competition matters before the European Commission and EU Member State competition authorities.

202 756 8061

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.