Advertisement

May 26, 2013

Number of gTLD Applications Nearly Quadruples Expectations 7 Month Objection Period Opens

We have a list, now what? On June 13th, 2012, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”), the organization that oversees Internet addresses, revealed that it had received 1,930 applications for new generic top level domains (“gTLDs”).

You may remember the uproar in 2008 when ICANN first announced that it was going to significantly expand the number of gTLDs. We all learned the lingo – that a TLD or “top level domain” is the group of letters after the “dot” in any domain name, such as .com, .org, .net, and .cn and that TLDs are “generic” if they are not sponsored by an industry (like the .edu, .mil, and .gov TLDs) and are not country-code TLDs (e.g., .au, .cn, and .ca).

ICANN took so long to launch the program, you may have forgotten it was happening. After years of preparation and multiple rewrites of the “applicant guidebook,” ICANN received 1,930 applications from companies, individuals, and common interest groups to create their own gTLDs and run their own domain name registries. In addition to paying the $185,000 application fee, each applicant was required to demonstrate in its application the requisite technical capabilities for running a domain name registry. Some of the proposed gTLDs are for brands, such as .GOOGLE, .YOUTUBE, and .WEATHERCHANNEL, while others encompass entire industries, .beer, .app, .shoe, .hotel, and the like. If approved, applicants, as registrars, will decide who can register particular domain names ending in those gTLDs.

For perspective, there are currently only 22 active gTLDs. ICANN's announcement means that the number of available domain names may increase by a factor of nearly 100; thus making domain name protection even more challenging.

The revealing of the list on June 13 also marked the opening of a 60 day period for public comments and a 7 month period for filing formal objections to the applications. Available objection grounds include:

  • Legal Rights: the applied-for gTLD violates the rights of trademark owners (including unregistered marks that have common law rights);
     
  • String Confusion: the applied-for gTLD is confusingly similar to another application or an existing TLD (available only to applicants or existing TLD operators);
     
  • Limited Public Interest: generally accepted international legal norms of morality and public order would be violated if the application were granted; and
     
  • Community: there is substantial opposition within the community targeted by the applied-for gTLD.

What You Should Do:

  • Review the list. Review the list of applied-for gTLDs to see whether your brand or industry is affected by any of the applications.
     
  • Consider filing an objection.
     
  • Organize an industry group. If one of the applied-for gTLDs affects your industry or a community of which you are a part, a coordinated objection involving multiple interested parties may be more effective and more economical.
     
  • Register your mark with the new Trademark Clearinghouse. ICANN established the Trademark Clearinghouse to protect mark owners from future domain name infringement involving the new gTLDs. The registration fee is nominal.
© Copyright 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Partner

Joan Archer is a litigation attorney handling intellectual property and complex litigation matters. She has first- or second-chaired more than ten jury trials, bench trials and preliminary injunction hearings. Her intellectual property litigation experience includes trademark, patent and copyright litigation.

For various organizations, Joan counsels regarding trademark and copyright issues. She litigates trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings and had handled many disputes involving the Internet, including those concerning domain names, black-market software, and other...

816-472-3139

About the Author

Associate

As a member of the Intellectual Property practice group, Tiffany Schwartz guides brand owners in matters involving trademark selection, registration, policing and protection strategies. She understands that our economy is largely driven by brand recognition and that protecting that brand is critical.

For clients in a variety of industries, Tiffany handles domestic and international trademark prosecution and provides opinions relating to trademark selection and infringement issues. She also negotiates and drafts agreements relating to intellectual property and counsels on...

314-259-4729

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.