May 24, 2012

Obama Administration Withdraws Draft Ozone Ambient Air Quality Standards and Reinstates 2008 Standards

President Obama announced on September 2 that his administration was withdrawing the draft ozone ambient air quality standards that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had prepared and was in the process of issuing as new regulations. The new regulations, had they become final, would have resulted in stricter standards related to ozone. This action does not relieve companies of compliance with any current air pollution control requirements because the withdrawn standards had not been adopted as final. Moreover, the withdrawal may result in only a temporary respite from new ozone standards because the Clean Air Act requires EPA to reconsider ozone standards in 2013. In addition, the administration has clarified that it intends to proceed to the next steps in implementing standards announced in 2008.

Ground-level ozone is formed by the combination of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight, and has been linked to respiratory health problems including decreased lung function and aggravated asthma. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set national ambient air quality standards for ozone and five other air pollutants, which states must achieve through imposing emission-control requirements on industrial facilities, vehicles, and other sources of the air pollutants in areas that do not attain the air quality standards.

EPA last issued a national ambient air quality standard for ozone in 2008 at a concentration of 0.075 parts per million (ppm), a standard that was stricter than the previous standard of 0.084 ppm, which EPA adopted in 1997. In September 2009, however, EPA announced that it was reconsidering the ozone standard for purposes of adopting even more restrictive air quality standards, and stayed the implementation of the 2008 standard. EPA engaged in a process of preparing revised ozone ambient air quality standards, but did not make the new standards final. The President's announcement prevented these newly revised standards from becoming effective, at least for now.

The 2008 standard is currently in effect, although subject to litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Absent judicial action that vacates or stays the 2008 standard, EPA will proceed to the next step related to implementing such standard—designating those areas that are in attainment and nonattainment with the 2008 standard, which, in turn, will trigger state and local implementing actions. EPA's webpage for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards lists both the 2008 and 1997 standards and indicates that the 1997 standard and the implementation rules for that standard will remain in effect while EPA undertakes rulemaking for the transition from the 1997 standard to the 2008 standard.

Further complicating companies' long-range planning, the Clean Air Act requires EPA to review and, if appropriate, revise the national ambient air quality standards every five years. Accordingly, the 2008 ozone ambient air quality standard, even though not yet implemented, is subject to review in 2013. It remains to be seen if the 2013 review of the ozone standard will result in standards similar to those EPA has now withdrawn.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Senior Counsel

Christopher J. McAuliffe is senior counsel in Morgan Lewis's Energy Practice. Mr. McAuliffe focuses his practice on environmental matters. He provides advice and representation with respect to environmental restrictions on new development, climate change laws, and compliance with water pollution control and air pollution control requirements, as well as solid and hazardous waste, site remediation, and environmental cleanup cost recovery matters. Prior to joining Morgan Lewis, Mr. McAuliffe provided legal advice and representation to the electric delivery, gas...

609-919-6619

About the Author

Partner

Ronald J. Tenpas co-chairs Morgan Lewis's Environmental and Climate Change Practices and is also active in the firm's White Collar, Government Relations, and Congressional Investigations Practices. Prior to joining Morgan Lewis, Mr. Tenpas served as the Assistant Attorney General (AAG) for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. In that role, he managed a 700-person division that included 400 attorneys, overseeing civil and criminal litigation arising under more than 150 environmental and natural resources laws. In that...

202-739-5435

Contributors

Partner

Mr. McAleese's practice is concentrated on environmental matters.

215-963-5094

About the Author

Senior Counsel

From 1984 to 2004, he was a partner in the firm. Mr. Lewis has more than 30 years experience dealing with federal and state clean air issues, and is leader of the firm's clean air practice. For the past 20 years, his practice has focused almost exclusively on issues related to implementation of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. In the 1980s, he provided advice under the clean air, clean water, toxic substances, and hazardous waste statutes. 

202-739-3001

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.