Advertisement

May 22, 2013

Obama Channels Roosevelt, Seeks "fair shot" for Americans Struggling in Tough Economy

The 1 percent privilege: Obama says big banks and Washington work against average citizens.

Seeking to channel the spirit of Teddy Roosevelt, President Obama skewered his ideological foes Tuesday for abetting and condoning a new Gilded Age of greed, economic inequality and vanishing opportunity for the working families of America.

 

President Obama says all Americans deserve a "fair shot" at opportunity. Carolyn Kaster/AP

President Obama says all Americans deserve a "fair shot" at opportunity. Carolyn Kaster/AP

“This is the defining issue of our time,” Obama told a crowd in Osawatomie, Kan., where Roosevelt laid out the progressive agenda in his “New Nationalism” speech of 1910. “This is a make or break moment for the middle class….At stake is whether this will be a country where working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home and secure their retirement.”

Obama deplored how forces like globalization and computerization have combined with political gridlock to leave workers with lost jobs and less pay, while the top 1 percent has disproportionately prospered.

“The rungs on the ladder of opportunity have grown farther and farther apart,” Obama said. In the years after World War II, a child born into poverty had a better-than-even chance of climbing into the middle class. Today those odds have shriveled to one-in-three. “For most Americans, the basic bargain that made this country great has eroded.”

Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski told the Associated Press that the president was “desperately trying new slogans and messages to see what sticks because he can’t figure out how to sell his last three years of high unemployment and more debt.”

Indeed, the president placed the blame for the stagnant economy on avarice, Republican obstructionism and laissez-faire policies—not on any failures of his own economic policies during three years in office.

The “big banks” and “billionaires” and a “certain crowd in Washington” exploit leaky campaign finance laws, take advantage of tax loopholes and buy the services of lobbyists who work against the interests of average citizens, Obama said. He urged Americans to rebuild the economy “based on fair play, a fair shot, and a fair share.”

Fair play, fair shot, fair share: these are Obama’s terms for what Roosevelt called the Square Deal. The Center for Public Integrity’s iWatch News is investigating the Raw Deal that working class families have gotten at the hands of policymakers in Washington and big banks on Wall Street.

Reprinted by Permission © 2013, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Staff Writer

Farrell is a prize-winning journalist and author. He spent his early career, and won a George Polk award, at The Denver Post. At The Boston Globe, he covered the first Iraq war, several presidential campaigns and served as the Globe’s White House correspondent and Washington editor, among other assignments. Farrell returned to The Denver Post in 2003 for four years as national columnist and Washington bureau chief for the newspaper and the MediaNews chain. During that time he helped lead the paper’s political coverage...

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.