Advertisement

July 24, 2014

OCR Issues Guidance on Methods for De-Identification of PHI Under HIPAA

On November 26th, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) released guidance on the methods that covered entities and business associates can use to de-identify protected health information (PHI) in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule.  The guidance, which was required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, provides practical information regarding what constitutes de-identified information, how de-identified information is created, and how to satisfy the Privacy Rule’s expert determination and safe harbor standards for de-identification.

Under the Privacy Rule, de-identified health information is not considered PHI.  As a result, covered entities and business associates may use or disclose de-identified health information without violating the Privacy Rule.  The Privacy Rule provides two methods by which health information can be de-identified:  the “expert determination” standard and the “safe harbor” standard.  The newly released guidance offers direction on how to meet these standards, and includes answers to frequently asked questions such as:

  • Who is an “expert” for the purpose of rendering health information de-identified?
  • How long is an expert determination valid for a given data set?
  • How do experts assess the risk of identification of information?
  • When can ZIP codes be included in de-identified information?
  • What are examples of dates that are not permitted under the safe harbor standard?
  • What constitutes “actual knowledge” in the context of the safe harbor standard?

OCR developed the guidance after soliciting input from stakeholders with experience in de-identification at a 2010 workshop held in Washington, D.C.  Given the applicability of the Privacy Rule to both covered entities and business associates, the guidance provides a useful tool that will enable health care entities and their partners that handle PHI to mitigate privacy risks.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Our attorneys are no-nonsense, get-to-the-root-of-the-problem kind of people. If there’s a faster way to get there, we’ll find it. It’s our job to give you clear answers and sound solutions.

We focus on what matters to you — whether it’s overcoming a legal challenge, taking your business to the next level, or having a trusted partner for ongoing legal advice. Think of us as an extension of your team with the legal know-how, connections, and industry experience to safeguard your interests.

It’s also our job to make sure you are meeting the...

617-542-6000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.