May 24, 2012

OEHHA Identifies 39 New Chemicals for Evaluation Under Proposition 65

The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the agency responsible for maintaining the list of chemicals subject to California’s Proposition 65, recently announced that 39 additional chemicals are being evaluated by the State’s Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC). There are already more than 850 chemicals listed as chemicals known to cause cancer, or birth defects, or other reproductive harm that are subject to Proposition 65, California’s “Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986.” The 39 chemicals noted in OEHHA’s recent announcement are not currently listed as carcinogens on the Proposition 65 list of chemicals. The CIC’s evaluation of these chemicals is one of the preliminary steps in the listing process. The meeting to consider these chemicals is scheduled for October 12 and 13 in Sacramento.

OEHHA’s announcement stated that it is accepting public comments on these 39 chemicals to be discussed at the October meeting. The CIC will evaluate the chemicals and provide advice to OEHHA on the prioritization of these chemicals for possible preparation of hazard identification materials. Although it is unlikely that all 39 chemicals will ultimately be added to the state’s list of chemicals known to cause cancer, this is a critical step in the listing process. Accordingly, any companies or parties interested in the potential listing of these chemicals should consider submitting comments to OEHHA.

After receiving advice from the CIC, OEHHA will select chemicals and prepare hazard identification materials for the selected chemicals.

The list of 39 chemicals includes some well known and widely-used chemicals, such as Acetaminophen, Bisphenol A (BPA), and Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (BBP).1 The complete list is set forth below.

No listing decisions will be made at the October 2011 meeting, however, interested parties that would like to provide comments and supporting documentation regarding scientific evidence related to any of these chemicals must do so by September 20, 2011.

 

39 additional chemicals currently being evaluated by the state’s Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC)
 

 

1BBP is already listed as a chemical known to cause reproductive toxicity, but has not yet been listed as a chemical known to cause cancer.

 

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Melissa Jones provides experienced and practical counsel in complex commercial litigation, appellate matters, and white collar criminal defense. She has represented clients from a broad range of industries in civil and criminal litigation matters, including several high profile cases, in both state and federal court. Ms. Jones has helped clients at every stage of litigation and has argued key motions and appeals, including several arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

916-442-1111

About the Author

Shareholder

Gene Livingston has practiced law since 1965. He founded Livingston & Mattesich in 1982 to represent clients in their interactions with the State of California. Gene was among the first attorneys in Sacramento to provide experienced and effective advocacy in all forums of public decision-making: legislation, regulation, and litigation. In February 1998, California Lawyer Magazine named Mr. Livingston one of the ten most "powerful lawyer-lobbyists in Sacramento" and noted, "Livingston was appointed by the Governor as the first director of California's...

916.442.1111

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.