Advertisement

May 25, 2013

OFCCP Restores and Updates Functional Affirmative Action Program Process for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors

On June 14, 2011, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) released a new directive to outline the process by which federal supply and service contractors can apply for Functional Affirmative Action Program (“FAAP”) agreements.

Background

Under Executive Order 11246, which prohibits federal contractors and federally-assisted construction contractors and subcontractors from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, any company with 50 or more employees and a federal contract of $50,000 or more is required to develop a written affirmative action program (“AAP”) for each of its establishments. OFCCP is responsible for enforcing this Order.

AAPs are designed to help contractors identify and analyze potential disparities related to the employment of women and minorities. Where disparities exist, contractors can use AAPs to articulate specific procedures they will follow and good faith efforts they will make to provide equal employment opportunities. FAAP agreements allow large contractors the flexibility to create AAPs by functional or business units rather than by individual establishments. For example, a company could develop an affirmative action program for all sales associates across multiple offices in different states as opposed to creating one for each work site.

Key Changes

In issuing its new directive, OFCCP made significant changes to the application and approval procedures for FAAP agreements. The new guidance rescinds a previous directive, Administrative Notice/Functional AAP, issued March 21, 2002, and ends a yearlong suspension in the acceptance of requests to develop or renew FAAP agreements while the program was under review.           

Most significantly, the new directive includes the requirement of written approval by the OFCCP director before contractors can begin developing FAAPs. This change eliminates the previous provision for automatic approval if OFCCP failed to act upon the request within 120 days. Also, the new directive provides for a shorter 3 year term for FAAP agreements at which point a renewal will have to be approved at time of application the OFCCP will review contractors. EEO violations from other local, state and federal agencies. In addition, the new directive provides the possibility of a compliance evaluation by OFCCP, should contractors fail to submit the required annual updates to their FAAP agreements.

Impact on Contractors

All contractors who currently have an approved FAAP agreement will be required to renew it in accordance with the new guidance. Contractors without these agreements should continue to maintain and develop establishment-based AAPs. Contractors considering whether to seek approval for a FAAP should carefully consider, in advance, the heightened OFCCP scrutiny of the Company and its compliance under the AAP. Regardless of whether contractors currently utilize FAAPs, those who do business with the government should be aware of the new directive, which can be found here.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

scott c. beightol, partner, labor and employment law, michael best law firm
Partner

Scott Beightol, a partner in the Milwaukee office, represents businesses in all aspects of employment and labor relations, with special emphasis in litigation of discrimination, noncompete and other matters in federal and state court, arbitration, and before the NLRB and OFCCP. Mr. Beightol counsels clients on workforce structure, HR audits and best practices, complex termination and disability/FMLA matters, and union relation matters involving labor negotiations and arbitrations. Mr. Beightol is Chairman of the law firm and chairs the firm’s Management Committee.

414-225-4994

About the Author

Sarah Flotte labor employment law attorney michael best law firm
Member

Sarah Flotte is a member of the Labor and Employment Relations Group in the Chicago office, focusing on employment counseling and litigation. Ms. Flotte’s practice includes defending employers in state and federal litigation, as well as before administrative agencies. Her representative experience includes issues related to: discrimination, harassment, retaliation, employee leave, reductions-in-force, employee handbooks and policies, affirmative action, breach of contract, defamation, and covenants not to compete. 

312-661-2104

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.