Advertisement

May 18, 2013

OFCCP’s Advance Notice of Proposed Compensation Data Collection Tool

On August 10, 2011, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, inviting public input on a new “Compensation Data Collection Tool”. The development of this tool signals the OFCCP’s intent, under the direction of President Obama, to vigorously pursue pay discrimination among contractors.

The new tool is set to replace the Equal Opportunity Survey (“EO Survey”), which the government deemed ineffective as a tool to target non-compliant contractors. According to the Notice, the OFCCP is considering adopting new practices that will substantially increase the burden on federal contract employers. Among other things, OFCCP has indicated that it may utilize the data collection to “to identify opportunities for nationwide multi-establishment compensation reviews.” The OFCCP is also considering requiring companies to submit compensation information as part of the bidding process for federal contracts.

According to the OFCCP, the proposed tool is intended to “provide insight into potential problems of pay discrimination by contractors that warrant further review or evaluation by OFCCP or contractor self-audit.” Data collected with the tool will be used to identify contractors for both compensation focused reviews and full compliance reviews. The OFCCP has indicated that the data will be used “primarily as a screening tool, although it may have research value.”

The purpose of the Advance Notice is to “solicit comments from interested parties as early as possible in the development process of this new data collection tool” and “maximize the opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process.” In light of the increased burden this new tool threatens to place on contractors, covered employers should consider submitting comments to the OFCCP. Comments are due 60 days after publication and may be submitted on this web site, or by mail or hand-delivery to: Debra A. Carr, Division of Policy, Planning, and Program Development, OFCCP, Room C-3325, 200 Constitution Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

scott c. beightol, partner, labor and employment law, michael best law firm
Partner

Scott Beightol, a partner in the Milwaukee office, represents businesses in all aspects of employment and labor relations, with special emphasis in litigation of discrimination, noncompete and other matters in federal and state court, arbitration, and before the NLRB and OFCCP. Mr. Beightol counsels clients on workforce structure, HR audits and best practices, complex termination and disability/FMLA matters, and union relation matters involving labor negotiations and arbitrations. Mr. Beightol is Chairman of the law firm and chairs the firm’s Management Committee.

414-225-4994

About the Author

Sarah Flotte labor employment law attorney michael best law firm
Member

Sarah Flotte is a member of the Labor and Employment Relations Group in the Chicago office, focusing on employment counseling and litigation. Ms. Flotte’s practice includes defending employers in state and federal litigation, as well as before administrative agencies. Her representative experience includes issues related to: discrimination, harassment, retaliation, employee leave, reductions-in-force, employee handbooks and policies, affirmative action, breach of contract, defamation, and covenants not to compete. 

312-661-2104

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.