May 24, 2012

OFCCP Takes Initial Steps to Require Burdensome Reporting of Compensation Data

In an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) published in the Federal Register on August 10, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) solicits public comments on a proposed requirement that contractors submit extensive compensation data to the agency through a web-based collection tool. The proposed reporting requirement would impose substantial new burdens on contractors at a time when the OFCCP has many other proposals pending that will also considerably increase the compliance burden.[1] For example, OFCCP has proposed revisions to the scheduling letter to request more detailed pay and personnel data in every audit.

The ANPRM explains that the data collection tool under consideration will be used in part by OFCCP to select contractors for intensive compensation audits. The OFCCP requests comments on the following types of issues:

  • The specific type of pay data to collect, such as average starting pay, average pay raises, average bonuses, salary, total compensation (including paid leave and retirement and health benefits),
    W-2 earnings, holiday pay, commissions, shift differentials, and stock options
  • The way to organize the data collection, such as by EEO-1 occupational categories, AAP job groups, census occupational codes, job titles, or departments
  • Factors that might explain average pay differences, such as average tenure
  • Factors that would allow for tests of statistical significance, such as minimum and maximum salary and standard deviation or variance of salary
  • Questions to capture information necessary to understand the contractor's pay systems and policies

While the proposed reporting requirement would be burdensome for contractors, perhaps more disquieting are three OFCCP proposals regarding its use of the pay data. First, OFCCP appears to be considering a requirement that contractors submit pay data and be subject to pay audits at the time they are bidding on new federal contracts or subcontracts. As the procurement process seldom would afford OFCCP enough time to conduct a comprehensive pre-award audit, the implication of this requirement is that contract awards could be delayed or scuttled based on the agency's simplistic evaluation of the aggregate pay data submitted by contractors during the RFP process.

Second, the ANPRM indicates that OFCCP plans to conduct nationwide, cross-establishment compensation audits triggered by the pay data contractors submit. The possibility of nationwide pay audits by OFCCP corresponds with the Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis's comments to the National Employment Lawyers Association, a major organization of plaintiffs' lawyers, shortly after the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes et al., 139 S. Ct. 2541, 2560-61 (2011). In her speech, Secretary Solis explained that the OFCCP is not bound by Rule 23 class action requirements to seek affected-class relief and that the agency intends to dramatically increase intensive compensation investigations.

Third, the OFCCP has indicated its intent to utilize the compensation data collected to study pay equity issues in certain industries and market sectors-a function far beyond its regulatory authority.

What's Next

In light of the OFCCP's aggressive focus on compensation discrimination, federal contractors and subcontractors should consider conducting privileged risk assessments of their pay data in preparation for potential compensation audits.


[1]. The proposed data collection implements a recommendation of the National Equal Pay Task Force, which published a report in July 2010. See http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/equal_pay_task_force.pdf. The task force report indicated that both the OFCCP and the EEOC would implement new compensation reporting requirements. The EEOC has commissioned a study by the National Academy of Sciences regarding "Measuring and Collecting Pay Information from U.S. Employers by Gender, Race, and National Origin." See http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/meetingview.aspx?MeetingID=5134&MeetingNo=1. The National Academy of Sciences is scheduled to issue a report in the fall "with findings and recommendations on what data the EEOC should collect to enhance wage discrimination law enforcement efforts." In one of the public sessions of the National Academy project, OFCCP Senior Program Advisor Pamela Coukos described this project as part of the "OFCCP Earnings Data Collection Initiative."

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

The Morgan Lewis Labor and Employment Practice strives for excellence in client service. For more than half a century, our lawyers have helped clients negotiate the ever-changing landscape of federal, state, and local laws that govern the workplace. We get to know you, your business, and your industry, and assist you in devising solutions to employment problems that affect the efficiency and productivity of your workforce.

215.963.5000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.