May 24, 2012

Ohio Use Tax: Ohio Department of Taxation Offers a Carrot Then a Big Stick

The Ohio Department of Taxation (ODT) recently announced an amnesty-like program that can result in substantial savings for taxpayers that have undisclosed Ohio use tax liability. The Ohio use tax is a complement to the Ohio sales tax, and is a tax on the storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property and certain taxable services in Ohio. It generally arises when a seller fails to collect sales tax on the sale of certain purchased personal property and services which are used in Ohio. Common examples include the purchase of property to be used in Ohio from an online vendor, a catalog company, or an out-of-state seller with minimum contacts to Ohio.

The Use Tax Education Program (UTEP) is a new initiative aimed at raising awareness of the use tax and inducing businesses to register and pay. As the ODT rolls out UTEP, the ODT is offering an extra incentive for compliance: taxpayers who voluntarily disclose unreported use tax liability prior to August 1, 2011, will only have to pay up to three years back tax and interest (currently 4%). Under normal use tax audit rules, taxpayers could owe tax for up to 10 years (although ODT policy is to only go back seven) and substantial penalties (generally 15% of the tax liability).

After the expiration of this incentive period, ODT will begin notifying taxpayers about UTEP by sending out approximately 380,000 use tax notices to businesses which the ODT believes have undisclosed Ohio use tax liability. A notice recipient may limit its exposure to four years of back tax and interest if the notice recipient contacts ODT prior to the time that ODT commences an audit. Any recipient that does not respond to the Notice may face a use tax audit under the ODT’s stricter rules (longer look-back and penalties).

Going forward, Ohio taxpayers should expect an increase in the number of use tax audits performed by ODT. The ODT’s release of several media announcements over the last four months indicates that the ODT plans to pay more attention to use tax audits than it has in the past.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Brian Close is a member of the Corporate Department. Brian's practice is focused on providing strategic counseling services for individual and corporate clients in general business, real estate and tax-related transactions, including representation in mergers and acquisitions, corporate structuring and restructuring, federal state and local tax controversies, tax planning, real estate tax appeals and corporate governance.  

614-227-4209

About the Author

Partner

Phil Zukowsky is a Partner in the Corporate Department. His practice includes planning for companies and individuals and for real estate and business transactions. Typical practice matters include structuring joint ventures, formation of partnerships, limited liability companies and corporations, public offerings, mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, like-kind exchanges and financings.

937-449-2842

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.