Advertisement

May 18, 2013

OIG Advisory Opinion Allows Complementary Transportation Services

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a favorable opinion regarding complementary transportation services. Advisory Opinion 11-02 examined a proposed arrangement to provide complementary transportation of patients to the hospital from physician offices located on, or contiguous to, the hospital campus. The transportation services would be provided by the hospital if physicians on the medical staff determine that a patient is in immediate need of treatment and there are no available private transportation options. The value of this transportation could be more than a nominal value, exceeding $10 per transport or $50 annually.

The OIG noted that the proposed arrangement potentially implicates the Anti-Kickback Statute and the civil monetary penalties law because the transportation could be offered to induce beneficiaries to obtain federally payable items or services from the hospital. However, the OIG determined that it would not impose sanctions based on a combination of factors:

  • The proposed arrangement would not be limited to transportation of Federal healthcare program beneficiaries. Instead, eligibility for the transportation services would be determined by physicians according to the hospital’s written policy;
     
  • The type of transportation – a van owned by the hospital and driven by an EMT employed by the hospital – would be reasonable;
     
  • The hospital would only offer transportation services from physicians’ offices located on or contiguous to the hospital’s 108-acre campus, approximately ¼ of a mile;
     
  • The hospital would not advertise the proposed arrangement;
     
  • There is limited access to and availability of local public transportation; and
     
  • The hospital would not claim, directly or indirectly, the cost of transportation on any Federal healthcare program cost report or claim, nor otherwise shift the cost to a Federal healthcare program.

You can access the March 24 Advisory Opinion here (pdf).

©2013 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Meghan O’Connor is a member of the Health Care Practice Group. Her practice focuses on general health law including managed care and provider contracting, risk management, and regulatory compliance.

Prior to joining von Briesen, Meghan worked for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services where she consulted with states regarding federal health law, regulation and policy, evaluating managed care contracts and conducting compliance reviews.

414-287-1586

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.