May 24, 2012

OIG Billing Reviews of Medical Device Replacements

The Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") recently published several reports finding that prestigious east coast hospitals incorrectly billed the Medicare program for replacement medical devices. These are not new problems.   In fact, it has been reported that providers often bill the Medicare program for replacement devices without accounting for the related credit which is refunded by the manufacturer to the provider.

Usually the government only takes issue with the failure to account for and refund Medicare the manufacturer credit. In the recent reviews, the OIG also scrutinized the hospitals for not seeking the credits under the device warranties. This twist is problematic because the government could next argue that the providers should have known about the credits and seek civil monetary penalties. It's also not outside the realm of possibility that the government wouldn't pursue the device company even if the provider failed to make a warranty claim or didn't meet warranty conditions.

Here's a few suggestions for mitigating the civil monetary penalty risk as well as taking advantage of warranty replacement in high dollar/volume device intensive areas like orthopedics and interventional cardiology:

  • Educating clinicians about the issue and impact on department resources. For example, with just fifty $10,000 devices, 2 million dollars could be lost if the devices are replaced and the warranty is not used with $500,000 in lost revenue, the threat of another $500,000 to 1 million in damages and $500,000 in legal fees not to mention reputation damage. 
     
  • Changing department forms for clinicians to indicate when a device has failed and may be eligible for warranty. 
     
  • Keeping commonly used device warranty information, restrictions and contact information in a designated binder.
Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Special Counsel

Karie Rego is a special counsel in the Corporate practice group in the firm's San Francisco office.

415-774-3187

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.