May 24, 2012

Oregon Court of Appeals Rules Non-Economic Damages Capped at $500,000 in Birth Injury Cases

On September 21, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals issued a significant decision answering what had been an open question under Oregon law: are non-economic damages statutorily capped at $500,000 in birth injury cases?

The medical negligence case concerned a complication that arose during the birth of a child and the injuries that the child sustained as a result of that complication. At trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the mother and child, awarding over $500,000 in economic damages and $1.375 million in non-economic damages. The trial court denied Oregon Medical Group’s post-trial motion to reduce the non-economic damages award to $500,000 in accordance with Oregon’s statutory non-economic damages cap which applies to certain claims arising out of bodily injury, and Oregon Medical Group appealed.

The Oregon Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in not reducing the non-economic damages award to $500,000. The court rejected the mother’s argument that the statutory cap is unconstitutional under the remedies and jury trial clauses of the Oregon Constitution, a challenge which previously invalidated the statute as applied to personal injury claims, but not wrongful death claims. The court held that the Oregon Constitution does not prohibit application of the non-economic damages cap to claims for prenatal injury because no such claim existed when the Oregon Constitution was adopted in 1857.

As the law in Oregon stands now, non-economic damages are capped at $500,000 in wrongful death cases and claims for prenatal injury, including injury that occurs during birth. The reasoning in this decision opens the door for arguments to expand the application of the cap in other types of personal injury cases

© 2002-2012 by Williams Kastner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

About the Author

Associate

Rachel Robinson is an associate in the Portland office of Williams Kastner. Her civil litigation practice focuses on product and professional liability cases

503-944-6925

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.