May 24, 2012

Pacific Standard Time - The Artist's Legacy

Attention shifts to Los Angeles this Fall, thanks to Pacific Standard Time, a stunning tribute to the Los Angeles post-war art scene. Pacific Standard Time (PST), spearheaded by the Getty Trust, presents simultaneous exhibitions and events at more than 60 Southland cultural institutions. PST provides an ideal opportunity for a closer look at practical business and legal considerations that preserve and shape an artist’s legacy.

Artists face unique issues that must be carefully considered and weighed to ensure the continued life of the creative output and to preserve the artistic reputation. Prudently managed business affairs will minimize problems commonly encountered when closing down a studio and during the transition of business affairs from the artist’s life to the artist’s estate.

First, there is the issue of care for the physical works of art, the critical planning for the inventory, conservation and storage of the artist’s works, including considering an archive as a permanent home for papers and other materials. Second is the issue of advantageously placing the artist’s works; which works should be preserved, which donated, and when, where, how. This naturally leads to the third issue, prudent sales; how much and what part of the inventory should be released for sale each year and through what means? Is this the moment to re-examine the extant gallery relationship? These decisions require knowledge of the art market, including a sense of timing, market conditions, and museum/collector interest. 

Getting the house in order also includes appointing executors, attorneys, and accountants who can be trusted, who know the family or estate, who are familiar with and responsible toward the artist’s work, and who have both sensitivity and concern for the future of the artist’s works and artistic reputation. Estate planning considerations for an artist are the same as for any individual: to provide for the surviving children, spouse and others according to the law and the artist’s wishes so as to assure orderly transition and minimize the potential for probate litigation. For an artist, though, preserving and enhancing an artist’s legacy include efficiently managing and planning the estate to maintain continuity and safeguard the assets.

Artists must also consider their intangible assets, which include copyrights, trademarks, licensing potential, and the like. It is important for artists to be aware of whether copyrights and trademarks are registered and/or appropriately titled, if any copyright renewal or termination rights exist, and whether there are any current assignments and licenses of the intellectual property. Artists should also consider licensing decisions to promote accessibility and generate revenue. It is critical to weigh each transaction in terms of its potential for affecting the artist’s stature in the art market. Indeed, one should consider the implications of each decision as it promotes and/or dilutes the overall value of the artist’s oeuvre. 

As we examine the post-war period and its influence on the future, we are reminded that artists’ reputations are made by the art world as a whole -- artists, collectors, galleries, the media and art press, museums and other cultural organizations. The artist must identify and express wishes so a comprehensive business and legal framework can be put in place to assure that legacy is preserved in accordance with the artist’s wishes.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP has a strong tradition of supporting the arts community. One of the firm's founding partners, Gordon F. Hampton, was a serious art collector and patron of the arts, who served as a trustee of the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art and helped to found the Fellows of Contemporary Art, a non-profit organization active in promoting and funding the work of contemporary artists. Continuing our legacy in the arts, Sheppard Mullin's Art Law Practice Group draws upon a wide variety of legal fields to provide the following services...

310-228-3700

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.