Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Parenting Issues in Divorce: A Guardian Ad Litem or a Parent Coordinator May Help

In a divorce proceeding, many types of experts can be utilized by the parties. These include financial experts, such as business valuators and forensic accountants, but may also include individuals retained by the parties and/or appointed by the court to assist with issues related to the minor children and shared parenting. These roles are often filled through the appointment of a guardian ad litem and a parent coordinator.

A guardian ad litem is someone appointed by the Court, frequently by agreement of the parties, to act as “next friend of the child, investigator or evaluator.”  Once appointed, a guardian ad litem (often referred to as “GAL”) determines what is in the best interests of the minor child(ren).  In so doing, the guardian ad litem is permitted to investigate allegations or issues affecting the child and, thereafter, submit his or her recommendations to the court. Accordingly, the guardian ad litem’s role in a divorce or other family law matter is to represent the best interests of the minor child, and to help the court, and the parties, reach decisions and resolutions that support and advance the child’s best interests.

On the other hand, a parent coordinator is a qualified individual retained by the parties to assist them in creating or implementing a Parenting Plan.  Termed a “child-focused alternative dispute resolution process” by the Florida Statutes, parent coordination facilitates the resolution of disputes between parents, which often arise as a result of their inability to engage in shared parenting. Specifically, parent coordinators work through issues with parents, make recommendations, and, with the prior approval of the parents and the court, make limited decisions within the scope of the court’s order.

The Florida Statutes set forth the qualification requirements for both guardians ad litem and parent coordinators, and further speak to other issues related to their appointment, such as confidentiality. Whether such an expert should be appointed is a case-by-case decision, highly dependent upon the issues involved in a particular matter.  Nonetheless, an attorney can help with making the determination as to whether such an expert is necessary or would otherwise be beneficial to the parties and their children, and can assist with recommending experts.  When children are involved, keep in mind there are experts out there that can help.

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2013. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Crystal Espinosa Buit is an associate in the Family and Marital Law practice, devoted to family law matters including dissolution of marriage, child support, child custody, alimony and family law litigation involving complex financial and parenting issues. Crystal also works in the firm’s burgeoning eDiscovery practice.

407-418-6315

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.